17

The Faux-Beef We Could All Do Without

Monday Mar 1, 2010 – by

Ding, ding.

The Tavis-Sharpton on air fight over whether or not President Obama was going to have a black agenda started out with a bang and ended with a whimper. What could have been one of the more substantial debates on the state of Black America, quickly disintegrated into a battle of the ego.

In one corner, Tavis ‘Less than Smiley’ and in the other Al ‘The Perm’ Sharpton. Smiley appeared on The Tom Joyner Morning Show and stated that some black leaders had begun “singing a new hymn” and hadn’t given him the sheet music to sing along. Some have said that Smiley was reacting to a recent meeting between Sharpton, Ben Jealous of the NAACP and others at the White House to discuss support for the Healthcare and Jobs bills from a Civil Rights perspective. It’s also possible that Tavis was upset about Sharpton’s recent New York Times quote where he said that “Obama was being smart not to ballyhoo a black agenda”.

Whatever the reason, Tavis must have hit the right button and got Al’s perm in a tizzy. And trust, I know from my pre-going natural — there is nothing worse than having your fresh perm get caught out in the rain.

Sharpton stormed into his afternoon radio show like a man on a mission retaliating against Smiley’s morning comments. Before long, Smiley called in to the show and in one of the most candid displays since Jesse’s castration slip, the two men started to throw down. With Smiley shouting out his upcoming conference like Funkmaster Flex on a mixtape and Sharpton getting into his Sunday morning at the pulpit upper range, the debate got heated.

Some coverage of this event has hyped this argument into representative of a major split amongst black leaders. In his piece on The Grio, Dr. Boyce Watkins pointed out that the fight between Smiley and Sharpton was part of “the great black divide” spilling over from the fallout after the Democratic Primary. But you have to wonder — if Hilary could get over losing the primaries and join Obama’s cabinet as Secretary of State, why are our black leaders who did not support Barack’s candidacy in the first place unable to find their own common ground to work and move forward. Frankly, I think this is nothing more than a grandiose argument about who is Obama’s BFF. As my favorite commentator Charles Barley would say, “These guys are lovers, not fighters.”

Ok so let’s be real. No one is coming to blows. Even if Smiley and the Perm were in the same studio, they were not going to get it crackin’. So then what is this? What round are we on again?

I think most people and I have lost count. I’ve come to a point now where I merge these squabbles in with the rapper beef and model catfights. It’s not that I don’t respect these men. They have dedicated years of their lives to furthering the work of Civil Rights and improve the lives of blacks in America. But honestly – Al Sharpton just got into a tweet war with Gilbert Areneas. If the Perm is going after people by @ replying them, I think we all are going to be a little less prone to take these outbursts seriously.

So what are most black people actually concerned with? Let’s see. Black America’s never ending recession?

At the start of this global financial crisis, Algernon Austin wrote in his report for the Economic Policy Institute, that Black America was trapped in a “permanent recession.” The report paints an abysmal picture of life for Black Americans “In the best of times, many African American communities are forced to tolerate levels of unemployment unseen in most white communities.” In a New York Times op- ed, Barbara Ehrenreich and Dedrick Muhammad write: from 2000 to 2007, as black employment decreased by 2.4 percent and incomes declined by 2.9 percent… That was the black recession. What’s happening now is more like a depression.”

Even in the years where most Americans experienced prosperity, Black America has still struggled to achieve success. The truth is that even when the nation as a whole comes out this recession, we will still have a long way to go.

To see the timeline of black unemployment throughout the recession check out www.timetoast.com.

The truth is someone needs to tell Smiley to chill and tell The Perm to relax. The truth is that both men are arguing for the same people, and hoping to bring them out of the economic, social and educational turmoil that is plaguing our community. Instead of the faux-beef, let’s move on to get the work done.

17 Comments – Add Yours

  1. avatar aaron says:

    Al Sharpton is a big character to me, he’s allot of talk , and one never sees the action, but hey thats just my opinion. I was glad to here the two got into it per-say, to me it was just a health debate/argument. Great Article.

  2. avatar Nikki says:

    Big permed Al is full of crap. I agree with Tavis, we need to hold Obama accountable period, just like we would if he were a white president.

  3. avatar Nic says:

    They both really annoy me. But not as much as Michael Baisdon.

  4. avatar Jay says:

    Al busted Tavis up–and I don’t even like Al.

  5. avatar Lala says:

    @Nic
    +1, but Steve Harvey annoys me the most!

  6. avatar srb199 says:

    Both men are full of themselves. The truth is Tavis wasn’t itching to hold Bush or Clinton’s feet to the fire about Black issues. They’re both jockying for a seat at Obama’s table that has not been extended, and that pisses them off. At least Rev. Al sees that, and has accepted his non-role.

  7. avatar Clnmike says:

    The interview was very specific about what these men were arguing about, which was a quote attributed to Sharpton that Tavis felt underminded his grudge with Obama. Tavis Smiely is NO BFF of Obama.

    1- This is Tavis’s fault he he saw too much in a quote attributed to Shapton and instead of calling him about it he threw him under the bus without giving him the benifit to respond, I can see why Al would be mad at someone who is supposed to be your friend pulling a stunt like that.

    2- It is no secret that Tavis has held some type of beef against Obama which I suspect started when Obama snubbed an interview request. Since then Tavis has had it out for him pointing out his faults while ignoring the political atmospherethat has conspired against Obama’s agenda. Tavis has always fashioned himself as the “real” King of the Blacks so anyone who gets shine is a threat. Dude is being petty.

    3- Obama is the President of the United States not the Presidents of the blacks.

    I would like to see what “black agenda” the President is supposed to devide his time with that would

    A) Not be advanced through his agenda for the country.

    B) That can not be handled by the black community on a local level with out the assistance of the goverment. Starting with bloggers who always got something to say but little to do.

    Which leads to…

    4- And finally it is getting real old to see the snide remarks and complaints by people about men and women who actually go out and try to do something and make a difference instead of sitting on the side lines, complaining and blogging about it.

    Put your track record up against theirs and lets make the comparison.

    Say what you will about men like Sharpton and Smiley they at least are willing to get out and do something even if it is just a moment of their time.

    • avatar keke says:

      I agree with most of the things that you said and I do think that this article does miss the point of what actually happened in the Tavis vs. Sharpton radio debate.

      I think one of the more interesting parts of their disagreement was near the end and it has not really received much attention. Al Sharpton asked Tavis Smiley who will be at the discussion panel/forum he is holding at Chicago State. Tavis then proceeds to run off the typical names who appear at all of his events: Cornell West, Michael Eric Dyson etc….and Sharpton then asks, “Who chose these people?” and begin to list some of the newer voices (Jeff Parks, Roland Martin). To me that was a huge challenge!

      Tavis Smiley had the State of the Black Union (SOBU) for 10 years.

      and in 10 years the design of that event was basically the same: A panel of black leaders/scholars sit up on stage and pontificate about what is wrong with black america, gain crowd applause, then announce what we need to do in order to fix it.

      10years we saw the same faces come back every year and say the same thing. Sure they sold books and provided a bunch of soul stirring points but what changed?

      what did the audience really learn? what workshops were provided or skill sets were gained in which the audience could take back to their communities and start making grass roots changes? I could be wrong but I don’t think any of that happened.

      I am not always the biggest fan of Al Sharpton and i do think he runs to the camera and seeks personal gain. But listening to that debate with Tavis, Sharpton is quick, he is tough, sharp, and out of many other prominent leaders, he has the ear of the president.

      I don’t think that the president is without flaws, but the idea of announcing a grand Black Agenda would be a bad move.

    • avatar Clnmike says:

      I agree that the “old guard” has done a lousy job in embracing new people, I think the reasons for that range from jealously gaurding their positions in leadership, not trusting the new comers and being out right out of touch with whats going on in the community.

      But thats all the more reasons to go your own way and not rely them, when people stop showing up to the townhall meetings and rallies that do not address their needs then they will get it.

      That can be accomplished with out the disrespect about their apperance (see this writers repeated use of the word “Perm” or the highschool gossip like glee taken in watching this arguement that a lot of bloggers have endulged in.

      It doesnt solve anything.

  8. avatar TEXASGRL says:

    Tavis is such a HATER!!! He is so jealous of Obama.Tavis is so unhappy with his life, why Idon’t know because he is equally successful in his class. But he just needs to face it, He is not OBAMA!!! Tavis sends a lot of negative energy!! Al take Tavis off your friend list….

  9. avatar Kalyn says:

    I agree with Clnmike… to a point. But you’re right this article (while entertaining) skips over some of the actual key points of what happened. Clnmike you made a good summary of what actually went down. But to be honest both Smiley and Sharpton are exceptional media whores. The article by Dr. Watkins (The grio.com) came to a good conclusion :
    “While the battle between Tavis Smiley and Al Sharpton makes for good radio, it does not make for good black leadership. Both men should talk it out, walk it out and find a way to a resolution. But the idea that all black leaders are going to be on the same page is as silly as thinking that all white leaders think alike – being of the same race and political party no longer means you see the world in the same way: Welcome to the post-Obama America”

    Just an interesting point – although one would hope that they’d solve any arguments with more civility than such a silly radio spat and bulk up and get some s(*& done.

    • avatar Clnmike says:

      Your right there both in love with the camera, but how else do you get the message out with out it? And why is it that the media keeps returning to them? Is it their fault or the fault of the newbies who are not pushing their issues hard enough?

  10. avatar modern lady says:

    IDK why anyone expected these phony, so-called leaders to truly debate issues that matter. Al Sharpton is bought, sold and controlled by white elites, anyway. I don’t believe ANYTHING that comes from his or Jessie Jackson’s mouth.

  11. avatar Jigga says:

    I agree with most of what ClnMike said. Rev. Sharpton was not picking a fight with Tavis. He was correcting Tavis because Tavis was mis-quoting him on national radio and telling millions of people that he was going to be doing something he never agreed to. If that wasn’t enough, Tavis also tried to make is seem as if the Rev’s meeting with Obama was less than fruitful. Not sayin that what happened in the meeting will change the whole world for African-Americans but they did discuss the money that actually IS being set aside for HBCUs and also discussed how to target the issues with unemployment in the African-American community. I would say that both of those things are worthwhile. It has been obvious for a long time to those that have been paying attention that Tavis has a grudge against President Obama for some very seemingly selfish reasons. As was mentioned by others, President Obama is the President of ALL the people, NOT just African-Americans. But the issue of unemployment in the African-American community must be addressed. And it’s not just about African-Americans being less educated or not having the job skills to compete. I know people with Phd’s and Master’s degrees who have real skill and knowledge who are unemployed. There has been a backlash by some of the whites making hiring decisions at some of these companies. When I was laid off, I had no idea so many African-American men even worked at the company I worked at until they were all being laid off in mass. I am in the Information Technology field. So some of this is just plain discrimination that is going on. But back to the topic . . . Rev. Al was simply saying that Tavis seems obsessed with the title “Black Agenda”. But the truth is, as long as President Obama does something to target the employment issues of African-Americans, it does not matter what it is called. I believe President Obama has taken some really good steps towards the problem. More can always be done, but people like Tavis should not be allowed to act like President Obama is doing nothing when the facts say otherwise. He needs to put his petty grudges on the back burner and get with the program.

  12. avatar Mason says:

    I have no use for Tavis Smiley. Legitimate disagreement is fine, but Tavis comes from a place of jealousy.

  13. avatar Deloris says:

    Tavis is an opportunist. I feel sorry for him not only is he out of the loop but he is envious of Barack Obama’s success within the black community and outside of it. Tavis personifies the crab in the bucket mentality. He hides under the guise of a black agenda but where was he during the Bush administration? I have watched Tavis on his late night show, as well as listened to him on Saturdays on NPR. Never has he been more critical of the presidency than he is now. President Obama can not be held accountable for black america. We need to hold ourselves accountable. We can not expect to progress vicariously through the president but we must make the efforts to move forward ourselves. I am an optimist and I see this new wave of progressiveness across the nation within our own communities. But we can’t allow poison such as Tavis to upset our core. At least Rev. Al Sharpton knows enough to support our president because if he fails it means that we have failed as a people. That’s what Tavis doesn’t get it’s not about him and his ego it’s about the nation.

  14. avatar Lynne in Alabama says:

    Tavis Smiley is a great disappointment! He adored the Clintons and I never, ever heard him hold them to the fire. He is an opportunist who wants to sell books. Al’s got it right, support the POTUS and work on the ground. We ALL will be receipients as long as Resident Obama works for ALL Americans! Tavis’ time is up and his hole-card has been peeped. Stop draining Black America with your pseudo love for us and your genuine love of money!

Leave a Comment

  • We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
  • Please keep comments related to topic.
  • Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.

Daily Blog - News.Gossip.Info