45

A Lady Knows When To Leave: What We Can Learn from Desirée Rogers

Monday Jun 21, 2010 – by

Recently both Star Jones Reynolds and Desirée Rogers–women known for their own exits– were back in the news. Johnson Publishing Company announced it was hiring the former White House Social Secretary to consult on their prominent publications Ebony and Jet, Star’s camp announced she will be writing a novel called The Lunch Club to be released Spring 2011. The book dishes the behind-the-scene drama of a nationally televised talk show hosted by a group of women–shelved in the fiction section, of course. Pardon my tone, but as soon as I saw Star’s press release I thought, “Dang girl, you really need to let it go.”

Star’s exit from “The View” happened in 2006, after ABC chose not to renew her contract and essentially gave her the boot from the show. After being told she could make a formal statement on the show’s Friday airing, Star broke the news early, letting out the details on a Tuesday to People to the surprise of the other women at the table. At the time, I felt for her. It baffled me they would keep right wing, wrong brain Elisabeth and let go of Star. I didn’t agree with everything she said, but give me a choice between her and the monster that is Rosie O’Donnell, I’d pick her no question.

But this next step? Sorry, I can’t support it. Am I hating? Not even. Frankly, it made me concerned because she chose to do so despite the success she’s achieved since leaving “The View.” The novel isn’t a bad move because of how she left “The View,” or even just as a matter of tact, it’s a bad move because it shows she hasn’t mentally left the situation. While she is a smart woman (and smarter than most people give her credit for), Star is making the mistake strong women make and make often– not letting go.

Despite personal fluctuations, you have to respect Desirée and for being a strong woman in public eye. As women in the workplace–especially women of color– we get at maximum, one incident before being labeled “the angry chick” in the office. It’s an unfair label but once it’s applied, it is a lasting one.

Say what you want about her debacle with the state dinner party crashers, Desiree’s name is back in the papers despite many who claimed she was destined for professional blacklisting. Working in the Obama administration was definitely a great look, but once it was clear the situation was winding down, Desiree did what Star Jones never got to- she made a graceful exit.

I’m being sure to use graceful, not perfect because once you have Congressmen calling for your resignation- you’re not able to waltz out to a thank you parade. But a week after the incident, Desiree was making arrangements to leave, tying off loose ends and allowing the staff to have as smooth a transition as possible. Star may have gotten the word of her departure out first, but Barbara Walters had the last word when she made the announcement on the air alone.

Four years ago, I watched as Barbara talk to viewers about Star’s departure, saying she had hoped Star “would announce it on this program and leave with dignity, but Star made another choice.” I didn’t like when Barbara said it then, but this time, I have to agree- writing this book is another choice and it’s only to make the same mistake twice.

I’m not worried about how the book will fare or what will be revealed. I just think about the energy Star will be expending writing it and how many times as women we put energy into something better left alone. Desirée didn’t do a media post game on leaving Washington. She did the best thing she could– move on. Claiming the next phase of your life means walking away from what’s still pulling you behind.

As strong women, we are used to handling our business and standing up for ourselves. We’re built tough and meant to withstand the trials that come. But sometimes the hardest thing for a fighter to accept is that the battle in front of her is not worth fighting. As painful as the critics can be and as much pride as we women have, sometimes leaving the room is the better choice.

I’m a proponent of strong women and a proud member of the tribe. Women who know what they’re worth exude a silent self-assurance from the minute they walk through the door. We are women meant for great things and meant to shine. As girls we’re told, “there’s nothing better than a woman who lights up the room.” But looking at Star and Desirée, I’ve come to amend that phrase. Because the truth is that a better woman knows when to leave, how to let go and that she can keep her light shining wherever she goes next.

The graceful exit is one of the most valuable weapons a woman can possess. There are some women who do it with ease. I am not one of them. On the scale of ohm through zen, I’m solidly behind Gandhi, the Dali Lama and Phil Jackson. Settling into my twenties, I’m starting to get why it’s so important to press the mental pause button and put things in perspective.

I’m no yogi, but even I know that if you’re trying to keep your balance, the worst thing to do is look away from the mirror. Keeping yourself focused is the best way to stay standing. So eyes straight, girl. The critics can’t take anything from you that you don’t give them.

Namaste, haters.

Photo Source

45 Comments – Add Yours

  1. avatar Akai* says:

    @Isolde what you find funny is your business and of no import to me.

    I found the question kind of funny for two reasons: #1) not everyone that pursues an MBA specializes or ‘focuses’ and the first year is usually spent covering a little bit of everything regarding business i.e. marketing, operations, finance etc. #2) I didn’t quite understand the insinuation I was getting that, somehow, Desiree was unqualified, not accomplished or not a high achiever.

  2. avatar lilkunta(isolde) says:

    @ isolde says: thank you. akai is difficult.
    you make very valid points that D is in that Chicago circle so of course she is taken care of. I hope she is able to help Ebony Jet.

  3. Great article! Desiree Rogers is a bad sister! I’m taking notes.

    I can relate to this is a number of ways. A few years ago I would have never agreed with this: “As painful as the critics can be and as much pride as we women have, sometimes leaving the room is the better choice.” Now, I agree completely.

    You hit the nail on the head with the “angry black woman” stigma that is easily attached to us for being strong, but not easily removed. There comes a point in life, especially in your career, where we as women must learn every battle is not worth fighting.

    Critics will be critics. As a writer I read some of the harsh and untrue criticisms I receive and my initial reaction is tell people why they’re wrong. However, I’ve learned that as a professional I can’t do that. Many times it is not worth it. I never thought I would agree that making a graceful exit and keeping your eyes on the prize is the best thing to do. Thank you for writing this.

  4. Amen! I love this mag, It’s always on point! Much love and Plenty Blessings to those who really have something of substance to say!

  5. avatar edrina says:

    Nice article but while the unpleasant machinations of Star Jones was written quite a bit of information about Desiree upstaging the FLOTUS-taking Vogue photoshoots before the FLOTUS was even featured, also planning to take photos at a later date in the white house gardens before being stopped by David Axelrod-the attached link spells it out.

    Not saying that Desiree’s departure wasn’t graceful but when you attempt to market yourself above and beyond your employer-wouldn’t you make a graceful departure (when said behavior had been discussed with you)?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/11/new-york-times-desiree-ro_n_496117.html?page=6

    • avatar isolde says:

      It’s tempting to throw shade at this woman because she rarely takes bad pictures, and she’s on point on so many levels, but I don’t think there’s any reason to believe that Desiree resigned because of anything besides the scandal. Valerie Jarrett’s Vogue profile ran before Michelle Obama’s as well. Valerie posed for editorials, covered NYT magazine, and no one suggested that she stepped on anyone’s toes, but when Desiree did the same . . . You know, Desiree didn’t seek out most of the press and publicity opportunities she accepted. They were offered to her, and she just didn’t turn them down, nor did Desiree give any interviews without getting the White House’s approval beforehand. The picture of Desiree in this article is from her WSJ shoot, and to me Desiree’s WSJ editorial looked the way Michelle’s should have and would have looked like in Vogue had Michelle let the editors style her, but Michelle wanted to wear her J. Crew duds.

      Plus it’s not like the Obamas didn’t know what they were getting. They knew she was glamorous and flashy. She was brought in specifically to bolster the cache of the “Obama brand” as being the antithesis of the previous administration. You know, rather than some random campaign contributor’s daughter planning a few events here and there, the Obamas were bringing in Desiree and her Harvard MBA to plan hundreds of events a year with style and flair, and she did that.

    • avatar lilkunta says:

      @isolde: DO you have links as proof? If Val was in mags & doing photoshoots why didnt it get press?

      Desiree def did plan things & not get WH approval 1st. That is why axelrod shut her *ss down.

      QUOTE: “The picture of Desiree in this article is from her WSJ shoot, and to me Desiree’s WSJ editorial looked the way Michelle’s should have and would have looked like in Vogue had Michelle let the editors style her, but Michelle wanted to wear her J. Crew duds. ”

      So yo’ure mad that mrs o didnt wear stupidly overexpensive stuff? mrs o has a mortgage, 2 kids, student loans, & bills. Desiree has no kids, & in addition to her big alimony payments, she uses her paycheck for expensive sh*t. That is why she has no problem wearing a $2,000 ugly shirt that just bc it is hermes or gucci it is labelled stylish. GTFOOH!

    • avatar isolde says:

      @lilkunta

      http://www.vogue.com/feature/2008_Oct_Valerie_Jarrett/

      http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/07/valerie_jarrett_on_new_york_ti.html

      Actually, Desiree has a daughter. The “shirt” is a Viktor and Rolf trench coat, not Hermes or Gucci, and it’s hardly ugly. And anyway, you do know that the clothes and jewelry that Desiree wore in the WSJ shoot were borrowed, right? None of Desiree’s alimony money was involved. Vogue offered to style Mrs. O, but she wanted to wear her own clothes for the spread, and it showed. Desiree’s WSJ editorial looked more put together because it was professionally styled. Let’s not pretend that FLOTUS hasn’t been wearing expensive designer clothes since before her husband was elected POTUS.

    • avatar Akai* says:

      Michelle Obama was featured in Vogue’s September ’07 issue a YEAR BEFORE Valerie Jarrett appeared in their October ’08 issue.

      Both occurred way before President Obama had even been elected, let alone seated in the Oval Office.
      http://www.vogue.com/feature/2007_Sept_Michelle_Obama/
      http://www.vogue.com/feature/2008_Oct_Valerie_Jarrett/

      The FLOTUS was featured again in the March ’09 issue of Vogue and wore a sleeveless dress by designer Jason Wu on the cover. The inside pages featured Michelle Obama wearing a Narciso Rodriguez dress and ONE J. Crew outfit in a shot where she was lounging and writing on a sofa.
      http://www.vogue.com/feature/2009_March_Michelle_Obama/

      I’m as much about the glamour and ice as the next indulged brat but IMO it would have been très tacky and insensitive for the FLOTUS to have appeared on Vogue’s March ’09 cover rocking $100K in diamonds and a $4K dress.

      It would not have been a good look (and antithetical to what the Obamas claim to be about) at that time when many Americans were suffering through unemployment, job loss, home foreclosure and irritated over the bailout of Wall Street and ridiculous bonuses some executives received.

      Michelle Obama is the woman hailed around the world as a fashion icon for her style and beautiful body, not Rogers. Though being “flashy” is easy and requires little thought – I wouldn’t want to see the media twist things and insinuate the FLOTUS was jealous or intimidated by Rogers. There is absolutely no reason for her to have been and I seriously doubt jealousy, insecurity or pettiness are characteristics of either Obamas.

      They’ve been friends for 20 years (I pray they still are) and the NY Times article was, basically, 2 pages of unattributed ‘I heard’ and ‘he said, she said’ with nothing substantiated. So, I’d hate to see two highly educated, accomplished and successful women of color pitted against each other, or have mess cooked up, in the press.

      Quite possibly Rogers began to believe her own press and may have grown a bit of a big head. There are many jobs/situations where there is no room for f*ckups and I believe Rogers rightfully got the boot because she screwed up big time (the state dinner) — nothing more, nothing less!

    • avatar Akai* says:

      The Obamas paid off their student loans a couple of years ago from the proceeds of the POTUS’ two best-selling books.

      Desiree Rogers has a daughter named Victoria.

    • avatar lilkunta( @ isolde) says:

      thanks for the links. we have a difference of opinion. i think desiree is a beauty but didnt look nice. mrs o too is a beauty, sometimes i like what she wears, other times i dont. you think dlooked professional but i dont. it isnt just about the photoshoot. as akai saod, it would not have been a good look for mrs o to be wearing 10,00 shirts while the us & world was in a recession.

      yes mrs o wore expensive stuff (from that store ikram goldman own) ,but again, comparing her to d and to past 1st ladies: laura, hilary, barbara, she wasnt wearing the name brands. what mrs o wears is more accessible. we are able to go to jcrew and to macys. oscar de la renta is expensive!

      my stance is still the same. d has more disposable income. FLOTUS doesnt not get a salary. mrs o, mr o, the two daughters, the dog bo, and grandma robinson are all living off the Pres’ $400,000 a year salary plus the $ he has saved from his book sales.

    • avatar lilkunta( @ akai*) says:

      akai: i hope it wasnt that d was getting a big head. perhaps she thought as social sec she was just being social? who knows?

      and both barack & michelle JUST paid off their loans in spring 2008( read her 15 pril 2008 speech @ haverford colle, PA) . they were ages . 46 and 44. the had $120,000 in sallie mae loans for columbia/harvard law(barack o) & princeton/harvard(michelle ) law. his book sales really helped. otherwise they might not have even ran for POTUS as they had bills to pay.

  6. avatar lilkunta says:

    great points Edrina! She shouldnt be more high profile than the Obamas, since they are the reason she was even Social Sec. Thanks for the info.

    She’s lucky is was axelrod who shit her down as Ive heard rahm emanuel cursed people out and berated them harshly.

  7. avatar Esperance says:

    gret article but I understand why Star wants to turn a situation into cash gotta pay the damn bills lol

  8. avatar ceecee says:

    This is an outstanding article, and the underlying lesson is something I will be sure to remember. Another person who I respect is Judge Sotomayor and how she kept her cool throughout her high court judgeship interview proceedings with the Senate.

  9. avatar d. says:

    I loved the article and totally agree with your assessment regarding the power in a graceful exit. On the other hand, we can not determine when a person has the ability to let go of an issue. Perhaps the book will be that vehicle for Star Jones. What we might ask is why does it have to be done in the eye of the public? Or will we learn why such a smart woman decided to forgo what Walters calls “leaving with dignity”? As usual the question for me concerning Star is who gets to decide what is best for oneself, is it us (fans, media, press), it is Walters as she alluded to in her statement about what she considered to be beneficial for Jones or is it Jones? As a matter of fact, I believe Jones has been one of the first to publicly admits her shortcomings, i.e. allowing her marriage to become a media charade,as well as her surgery. Why would she stop at this? Perhaps this book is her way of getting it straight so we can see that her exit she chose was as graceful as she could have made it possible with no lost of dignity to herself. As for Rogers, graceful yes, respectable always, that is what is owned a friend (The Obamas) when we look out for one another. …And, by the way, there is nothing wrong with that!

    • avatar lilkunta(@ d) says:

      @ d : I disagree.Star only admits her shortcoming when she stands to make $.
      when courtTV rebranded itself & gave her a flagship show is when she admitted to her marriage busting & her gastric bypass. For the past 5 yrs before that she didnt admit to it. She stupidly thought we would believe her intervention was a diet & exercise. GTFOOH.

      To me Star is doing this to make $.
      She is a lawyer, why not practice law? Why not write crime novels?
      Instead she wants to write a fictional version of THE VIEW. That to me says she hasnt let go.

      When Walters published her book Audition Star said this to US mag:
      “It is a sad day when an icon like Barbara Walters, in the sunset of her life, is reduced to publicly . . . speaking negatively against me all for the sake of selling a book. It speaks to her true character.”

      ..so now Star is the 1 coming out w a book, what does this say bout her character?

  10. avatar Lyoness says:

    Namaste Haters… Love it!!!

    I love this article. Always act like a lady even under the most unpleasant and unfortunate circumstances. That’s what people remember. Star still isn’t over it and now she’s writing a book…It’s been nearly 6 years. She needs to see a therapist.

    I still don’t understand why everyone was mad at Desiree. There were emails proving that the gatecrashers didn’t have tickets. This was before the event. Her office gave Secret Service a list of who was invited. They weren’t on the list when they got to the gate so bottom line Secret Service should not have let them through. The husband’s brother went on the morning shows talking about they were the black sheep of the family because they’re always out for attention and trying to cheat someone. Now these jokers are supposed to be on Real Housewives. Not Cool!!!

Leave a Comment

  • We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
  • Please keep comments related to topic.
  • Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.

Daily Blog - News.Gossip.Info