92

Young Women Stage ‘Fashion in Action!’ Demonstration at New York Fashion Week

Wednesday Sep 15, 2010 – by

On September 9, the opening day of New York Fashion Week, a group of young Black women staged a silent demonstration. The 20-something ladies wanted to acknowledge the first time in their lifetimes that Essence magazine—a formidable Black women’s print beloved by scores Black girls for 40 years—does not have a Black fashion director. The group of professional and educated women, many of whom are fashion and media insiders, also stood in protest of the added fact that there are no Black fashion directors at any mainstream fashion or lifestyle publication.

Dressed in all black, the walkers carried signs depicting every fashion director in Essence magazine’s 40-year-old history. Large signs in bold font read, “I Am Susan Taylor,” “I Am Kevin Stewart,” “I Am Harriette Cole.” Signs also read simply, “I Am A Black Fashion Director.” The demonstration was informed by the iconic 1968, “I Am A Man” march.

The walk began at the Essence magazine headquarters at 50th street and concluded at 63rd street in front of the Lincoln Center, the new home of New York Fashion Week.

CLUTCH magazine was on hand for the demonstration and walked in solidarity and support of the cause.

The organizers were moved to action after discovering Essence magazine hired a White fashion director. The walk’s participants were primarily inspired by Michaela angela Davis, a fashion and media veteran who boldly spoke out to several media outlets, and exclusively to CLUTCH, about her sadness about the print’s shocking decision.

Davis was not only a muse for what the organizers deemed, “Fashion In Action!,” she was an on-hand organizer, and trailed the ladies for the entire walk.

CLUTCH spoke to the “Fashion In Action!” walk producer Quan Lateef, a burgeoning media professional and host of the popular New York-based radio show Avenue Pink. Lateef partnered with Davis and assembled the walk participants. With the help of assistant Bayyina Black, Lateef even organized a police escort to accompany the women as they peacefully marched.

“I’m so humbled right now by the grace and power of this Black girl movement,” Lateef shared. “We came out here with love as the driving force and remained peaceful and compassionate throughout.”

The group of women didn’t speak one word. They allowed their own image—brave and fierce young Black women—to be the only speaker.

Lateef further explained the demonstration’s motivation. “We chose to make this a silent demonstration because we were not angry or bitter. We didn’t need to shout or holler. We’re just over it!” Lateef continued, “Whether the powers that be heard it or not, our silence spoke volumes.”

The walkers were passionate about the demonstration, and many were moved to tears. Bayyina Black, an organizer and walk participant, explained that the demonstration was bigger than Essence. “When I first heard of Essence magazine’s decision to hire Ellianna Placas, I was definitely shocked, but was not as upset as I thought I would be.” Black shared that it wasn’t until she engaged in the planning of “Fashion In Action!” that she realized it wasn’t just about Essence magazine. “I had a very real and open dialogue with Michaela angela Davis and realized this issue was a lot bigger than Essence.” Black continues, “On a larger scale, in the year 2010 there is only one woman of color, Nina Garcia, who is a fashion director in the entire fashion industry.”

The “Fashion In Action!” New York Fashion Week march proves that it’s not about complaining but moving to action in order to evoke real change. The demonstration also represents a shift of the hip-hop generation’s cultural memory. The Black protest tradition has been largely about singing, wailing, and, at times, even screaming. The walkers’ decision to remain silent, and, at a point near the end, stand in stillness, was a powerful and moving display to bear witness.

At the peak of the walk the women generated a slew of fascinating reactions from the city’s spectators. One man yelled, “Why aren’t you speaking!” People passing by stopped and read the signs, questioning who many of the names were. A little Black girl said, “Mommy! Look at the models!”

Once the demonstration reached 63rd street, and the ladies stood silently directly across from the Lincoln Center, there was full-on crowd. More police officers, smiling supporters, confused fashionista on-lookers, and even Harriette Cole herself, who reported live for BET News. Cole interviewed Davis on-site and asked about the demonstration. Davis said it is more of a tribute and homage to the women who paved the way.

A lauding salute it was indeed. After the tribute ended, we spoke to Jasu Sade, one of the participants who marched in 4-inch stilettos. Sade shared she was still overwhelmed by the emotional high of it all. “We did it for the right to illustrate our own stories and to restore our legacy.”

In the end, participants kept a hold of what is likely to become piece of Black American memorabilia. We held our “I Am A Black Fashion Director” signs all the way home, back to Brooklyn.

And the movement continues! New York University’s Institute of African American Affairs will host a panel discussion, “Fashion Takes a Trip to Post-Racial USA?”, featuring Esther Armah, Michaela angela Davis and Isolde Brielmair. The critical discussion will talk “progress, power, presence, diversity in the world of publishing and media” on Friday, September 17, 6pm at 41 East 11th St. at University Place 7th floor. CLUTCH will be there, and we hope to see our New York-based readers there too!

Photo Credit: The brilliant fashion photographer Marc Baptiste was on hand to document the tribute. Baptiste bestowed the images online exclusively with CLUTCH.


92 Comments – Add Yours

  1. avatar binks says:

    I think the protest was classy and thought provoking, I agree with the line “that it isn’t necessary about Essence but the lack of women of color in general” in these high profile fashion jobs in this day and age and when you look at fashion/magazine industry as a whole not only in the US but else where we are still under represented in this business from being a fashion editor, models, fashion designers, etc. etc. I just like the message behind it. However, I think we should also keep in mind that there is an under current to this movement with people making their own strives in fashion by saying f*** the tradition route and creating their own for example, urban fashion blogs.

    • avatar NiCole says:

      NiCole says:
      September 17, 2010 at 2:40 am
      This is a waste of protest. Especially since this magazine is OWNED by white people. Essence magazine is white owned and constantly fuels negativity into the black community. This magazine is nothing more than an outlet for whites to continue to do what they always do. Brainwash and keep their bullshit statics going.There are constantly articles about colorism, black women vs. black men, light skin and corporate America, black women having AIDs and black men in jail. The models should have been doing a general protest. Why do black people feel so passionate about businesses that are not even OWNED by blacks. A mess! They should have been protesting Shouler’s debasment of black teens.

      Essence is a piece of shit magazine. Do these beautiful young women know that the white female that runs this recently claimed that she is sick of catering to a bunch of “angry black women???” The issue is not about a black fashion editor. That is so stupid. There are black editors on staff but this magazine is owned by TIME Inc. GOOGLE is their friend! They are mad because a white woman is on staff now…LOL. She should be anrgy at who owns this mess and is perpetuating negativity. Simple

  2. avatar prada bags says:

    Very interesting post. Thanks again.. Please Keep it Up!!

  3. avatar Leah says:

    When Michaela put together a beauty panel to discuss black beauty, all the panelists were very light skinned black women. This obviously didn’t represent the full scope of black beauty and many of us recognized the uniformity in complexion. When questioned about it, Michaela said they weren’t chosen for their color but because they had the experience in the beauty industry. Really?????

    Someone please explain to me how 1. Michaela couldn’t find a darker skin black women with experience in the beauty industry to be on the panel and 2. but then attack Essence hiring Placas based on her experience instead of her color.

    I’m tired of the ‘save your own ass’ excuses and hypocrisy.

  4. avatar Joy says:

    Wow – a protest about the lack of women of color in the fashion industry and at the same time a protest that a black magazine hired someone who wasn’t black. UM, ok.
    Anyway, I think it would have been a stronger message if the women had simply protested the discrimination in the fashion industry (shown by lack of women of color) instead of at the same time showing how they themselves would like Essence to discriminate based on color.

    Then in the same movement you promote Nina Garcia when she basically looks the same as Ellianna Placas? Seriously?? Who planned this walk again? SMH
    For picture of Placas: http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/08/the_essence_controversy.html

    • avatar Interested says:

      Joy, I can explain the Nina situation very easily. Look at the attacks on Black women responding to this very topic for even suggesting that Black women deserve somthing to call their own in the world of fashion.

    • avatar Leah says:

      Thank you Joy. I’ve said the same thing about this protest. It would’ve had more credibility in my book if they addressed the lack of diversity they claim exists in the fashion industry instead of targeting Essence. Fight against racism by displaying racism.. umm no. Which in my opinion seems to be cloaked with hidden agenda for Michaela to attack Angela.

    • avatar NiCole says:

      This is a waste of protest. Especially since this magazine is OWNED by white people. Essence magazine is white owned and constantly fuels negativity into the black community. This magazine is nothing more than an outlet for whites to continue to do what they always do. Brainwash and keep their bullshit statics going.There are constantly articles about colorism, black women vs. black men, light skin and corporate America, black women having AIDs and black men in jail. The models should have been doing a general protest. Why do black people feel so passionate about businesses that are not even OWNED by blacks. A mess! They should have been protesting Shouler’s debasment of black teens.

      Essence is a piece of shit magazine. Do these beautiful young women know that the white female that runs this recently claimed that she is sick of catering to a bunch of “angry black women???” The issue is not about a black fashion editor. That is so stupid. There are black editors on staff but this magazine is owned by TIME Inc. GOOGLE is their friend! They are mad because a white woman is on staff now…LOL. She should be anrgy at who owns this mess and is perpetuating negativity. Simple.

  5. [...] the opening day of New York Fashion week a group of black women staged a protest over Essence’s hiring of a white fashion director and the lack of black fashion directors at [...]

  6. [...] the opening day of New York Fashion week a group of black women staged a protest over Essence‘s hiring of a white fashion director and the lack of black fashion directors at [...]

  7. avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

    …and speaking of minorities and education? It continuously boggles my mind how individuals quickly wholesale swallow things regularly without displaying the intelligence to seek out the truth — then allow puppeteers to play on their victim stance, pull their strings and get them all ‘racially’ riled up. …suckers!

    Just as some people act like there is no Naomi Campbell, Liya Kebede, Alek Wek, Selita Ebanks, Roshumba Williams, Sessilee Lopez, Chanel Iman, Beverly Peele and other black models, they erroneously claim there are no blacks working at white publications.

    I’ve an idea the following will be ignored (because it does not serve or further the victim cries) but here’s a list of “…the black fashion and market editors currently working full-time at mainstream publications”:

    Julee Wilson – Real Simple
    Rajni Jacques – Nylon
    Matthew Henson – Flaunt
    Shiona Turini – Teen Vogue
    André Leon Tally and Chioma Nnadi – Vogue
    Anoma Whittaker – Complex
    Shanelle Rein-Olowukere – People StyleWatch
    Wendell Brown – Esquire
    Mobolaji Dawodu – Fader
    Lindsay Taylor-Huggins – Self
    Zandile Blay – Paper

    Additionally “…Placas is hardly the first white editor to work for a publication targeting a black audience. Niki Schwan, Vibe’s current fashion director, is white, as is founding editor and current editor-at-large Rob Kenner. Over at XXL, a hard-core hip-hop publication geared toward young black men, editor-in-chief Vanessa Satten is both white and female.”

    As already mentioned, Essence owned by the white Time Warner and “aside from its African-American editorial team, much of the talent employed to produce [Essence] isn’t, in fact, all black. The photographers, stylists, and even catering companies hired for photo shoots featuring black models are very often white. The fashion designers and brands covered in the magazine’s pages are by and large white companies. New York Fashion

    • avatar Leah says:

      Akai you have a gift with writing. PLEASE see if you can compile your thoughts on this issue & email them to Angela to be included in Essence. Your (our) voice needs to be heard too. I applaud you sister.

    • avatar Interested says:

      Akai, in all seriousness, what exactly is it you are trying to say? Why do you constantly dismiss any pointing out of anti-Black female racism as whining and victimhood? In your view, do you think that Black women/girls have the same chances and opportunities as everyone else, other races of women in particular?

      Also, can people please remember that Essence was necessary in the first place because Black women/girls had no similar female-oriented publication to call their own.

    • avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

      Careful there, Miss Leah. I’m one a’ those Latinas and don’t have a place and not quite worthy of the title “sister” according to *some*. (smile)

      I freelance for several publications on the side, but my @ss ain’t foolin’ with no Michaela. …I’m skurd!

    • avatar Leah says:

      LMAO! Girl please, those that would have issue with you being called ‘sister’ are the same ones that could benefit from some of your schooling! Someone needs to shake up the perpetual victim mentality that’s being shoved down their throats and I think you’ve got the gift of words to do it. Plus I think you probably have big cajones (smile) to take it on.. and to take on Michaela!

    • avatar DelphineBlue says:

      With the exception of Naomi from your list, how many of those Black models did you see walking the runways this season? Put on your Google hat and do some research about the continued whitewash of the collections here and in Europe, and then come back and mention more Black models who make the rare, unicorn sightings in those shows. I mean Roshumba, Beverly Peele, really? You had to go back in the archives for that. For even more fun, watch that recent show (think it was Bravo) that followed a real live Black young model around as she is told no one is checking for Black girls this season, and probably not the next one either. Guess she is a sucka victim, too? Or someone who actually has the guts to speak up about racism in this industry.

      And re: your argument re: White editors of other Black mags–guess you wouldn’t be aware of this since you are “one of those Latinas”, but Black people are not monolithic. Many “legacy” Essence readers probably don’t read Vibe so they really couldn’t care less who is the fashion editor there. And did you actually mention XXL magazine—yeah a whole lotta middle class Black women want to know what lil wayne n’em are up to with their fashion. And this is a demographic that has made an industry off calling each other ni66a. their ideals about presentation are slightly different than the average Essence reader—so what were you saying about XXL having a White editor and that no one is upset about that?

      I was one of the participants in that protest and for me it was beyond Essence and Michaela. I also worked in the fashion industry years ago, and know that it’s an openly racist industry that needs to be challenged by the talented, marginalized people who contribute to it behind the scenes. What other industry can put blackface on Whites and call it art–You can call it victimization if you want to, but I am sure any gains that could be made by this movement, you would gladly reap the benefits of any leftovers of someone else’s struggle.

    • avatar DelphineBlue says:

      Meant to add, you are wise to not want to take on Michaela.

    • avatar Kim says:

      Thank you Delphineblue. I am so glad that one of you who actually participated in the silent protest finally spoke out.

    • avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

      Uhm, that comment referenced a bit of an ‘inside joke’ regarding another article and, obviously, you didn’t understand the context.

      I speak my mind all day everyday; always have and always will! If you’re the timid fraidy-cat type, that’s fine but try not to project your own challenges since I can’t imagine one reason to hesitate to speak honestly to/in front of Michaela, Santa Claus, Barney, the POTUS or anyone else. I’ll stand firm, at any time, against any claims of there being anything even remotely right or noble in fighting racism by being racist/bigoted.

      It’s always a challenge to attempt a discussion with those so filled with anger and drunk on victim-juice that they can barely keep it civil in disagreement then proceed to distort statements (what I disputed were hyperbolic claims I’ve often heard/read that there are no black models and insinuations that all of them are/have been ‘light, damn near’), argue against things never written (that blacks are a “monolith”), misrepresent what was actually stated (IMO anyone that fell for Michaela’s race-baiting bullsh!t and agenda-riddled attack on Burt-Murray are “suckers”), and failed to comprehend that an article written in New York Fashion Magazine – which pointed out white editors at publications that target black audiences – was quoted.

      Didn’t black models i.e. Rose Cordero, Sedene Blake, Re’l Dade, Shena Moulton, Sessilee Lopez and others work the runways this past New York Fashion Week? And my bad for Peele and Roshumba, so would Oluchi Onweagba, Jourdan Dunn or Arlenis Sosa do??? And, look, I’m not disputing that there should be more diversity; what I dispute is exactly as I previously stated (i.e. insinuations that all “black” models are/have been light-skinned, mixed etc.). Additionally, I do see many complaints as selfish, self-centered and whiney as hell (and I offer no apology for that) and, speaking of all having “the same representation as everyone else” — are you really ’bout it or merely talking???

      There are also Asian, Latino and Native Americans, however, by being so daggone consumed with constantly playing the ultimate victim of all time, little note is taken of the fact that those groups are way more under-represented than black models.

      Now have a wonderful evening and goodnight, Delphine.

    • avatar DelphineBlue says:

      Now explain how this protest was bigoted–because it was all Black women? Please. And yes you can certainly speak your mind, but when you are juvenile calling by calling people “sucka” (who still says that anyway?) because you disagree, prepare to be brought down a notch. As Michaela would certainly do with you, so you are right to be “skurred” as noted earlier.

      You: “It’s always a challenge to attempt a discussion with those so filled with anger and drunk on victim-juice that they can barely keep it civil in disagreement then proceed to distort statements (what I disputed were hyperbolic claims I’ve often heard/read that there are no black models and insinuations that all of them are/have been ‘light, damn near’), argue against things never written (that blacks are a “monolith”), misrepresent what was actually stated (IMO anyone that fell for Michaela’s race-baiting bullsh!t and agenda-riddled attack on Burt-Murray are “suckers”), and failed to comprehend that an article written in New York Fashion Magazine – which pointed out white editors at publications that target black audiences – was quoted.”

      Sorry but if you are a “writer”, you will need a refresher course in punctuation and sentence structure. Just saying.

      You are more misguided than previously thought–if I wasn’t “bout it” as you say, I would not be participationg in protests, and the other various activities I do on my own time, primarily in media–the other alternative would be to post on a message board writing fragmented, emotional comments about a topic that I would appear only vaguely familiar with instead–oops. And if plenty other women with influence who are “bout it”: like Bethann Hardison, Constance White, Naomi, Iman and co. were the reason why there was an Italian Vogue issue that featured only Black models, and it sold out within hours in Europe and America. If these women had listened to the type of nonsense you are spouting, they woulda been too concerned with upsetting the system and looking like victims–and I am so appreciative they are not.

      And speaking of Naomi again-also Google how when she started her good friend Christy Turlington threatened to not work for certain designers, because they refused to hire Naomi because she is Black. And again, I am glad Naomi has addressed this publicly.

      And if you read the entire article posted above, you would have heard the protest organizer state: ““We chose to make this a silent demonstration because we were not angry or bitter. We didn’t need to shout or holler. We’re just over it!” Lateef continues, “Whether the powers that be heard it or not, our silence spoke volumes.” And she is telling the truth–we were instructed to smile politely if anyone asked a question, but to not speak and distract from the UNIFIED front of a group of professional, dignified Black women silently approaching this topic in a high profile manner. And like i mentioned earlier, we got plenty of positive encouragement. However your insistence at implying we were just a bunch of angry Black women is an old, tired trope that has been attempted for decades by people with more influence and power than you. Next.

      You: “There are also Asian, Latino and Native Americans, however, by being so daggone consumed with constantly playing the ultimate victim of all time, little note is taken of the fact that those groups are way more under-represented than black models.:

      I knew that was your problem-lol. So THERE is the rub once again, another non-Black Woman all upsetted because Black girls got together to strategize. I read the same thing on another message board yesterday, folks mad because non-Black women were not present at the protest. I don’t know if that was the request by the organizers–shrug–But the light, brown and dark Black girls were there in our freaking glory, IMO it would not have bothered me if Latina, Asian, etc. were present but guess what-it would have been a different protest. And since it was conceived and organized by Black women, that is who showed up.

      And “little note is taken” by whom? Since you acknowledge that Latinos are under-represented which is true, why don’t you rally with Latina magazine and do the same thing the ladies from Essence and BET accomplished if you are so worried about what Black women are doing with our time? What exactly is stopping you? I think it would be fantastic, let the industry know we are ALL tired of this bs. But instead, you would prefer Black women to be silent and be happy with the crumbs sent our way-ain’t gonna happen. But do you.

      And I will say it again and more clearly this time so it can not be misinterpreted–What you like to claim as “playing the victim” has ultimately been the result of primarily Black Americans taking the establishment to task–with results that end up benefiting everyone. If this is an issue for you or anyone else, then it’s your responsibility to use the resources available to all of us. But apologists who are all happy because there are a handful of WOC in a season of several hundred White models can go sit back in the corner, your assistance is not required.

      You have a wonderful day as well, and it’s DelphineBlue.

    • avatar Kim says:

      @DelphineBlue

      And I will say it again and more clearly this time so it can not be misinterpreted–What you like to claim as “playing the victim” has ultimately been the result of primarily Black Americans taking the establishment to task–with results that end up benefiting everyone.

      That right there is the real issue. They know it. That is why they themselves “play the victim” and are so angry at you and me. Keep on moving ladies.

    • avatar Leah says:

      To DelphineBlue:

      YOU: Now explain how this protest was bigoted–because it was all Black women? Please. And yes you can certainly speak your mind, but when you are juvenile calling by calling people “sucka” (who still says that anyway?) because you disagree, prepare to be brought down a notch. As Michaela would certainly do with you, so you are right to be “skurred” as noted earlier.

      I’m obviously am not Akai but I agree with her stance and applaud her integrity and intelligence. IMO this protest was bigoted because as indicated in all the write-ups for it, it was inspired/organized by Michaela and her reaction to Essence’s hiring of Placcas. And by reaction, I’m referring to the ANGRY, extremely dramatic outbursts Michaela has displayed that GASP! Placcas is a white woman. So yes, the correct description is bigoted or intolerant.

      I highly doubt Akai is genuinely “skurred” of anyone. She was being facetious. And a difference of opinion doesn’t require her or anyone to be “brought down a notch” by Michaela or anyone else; nor do I see it even feasible. Please.

      YOU: Sorry but if you are a “writer”, you will need a refresher course in punctuation and sentence structure. Just saying.

      Let’s not go there seriously. I’ve read numerous articles where your homegirl Michaela could use a lesson or 2 in sentence structure, spelling and grammar. Sometimes on the 2nd grade level: you’re is the contraction for you are, not your. .

      I don’t remember Akai, I or anyone else claiming that racism does not exist in the world or in the fashion industry. But my issue is that this “demonstration” was a result of the fury Michaela felt as result of Placca’s hiring. Again, not because she isn’t qualified and hasn’t brought her A fashion game to Essence. But because she is white. Trying to battle racism with racism lacks integrity and makes a mockery of the initial fight.

      YOU: And if you read the entire article posted above, you would have heard the protest organizer state: ““We chose to make this a silent demonstration because we were not angry or bitter. We didn’t need to shout or holler. We’re just over it!” Lateef continues, “Whether the powers that be heard it or not, our silence spoke volumes.” And she is telling the truth–we were instructed to smile politely if anyone asked a question, but to not speak and distract from the UNIFIED front of a group of professional, dignified Black women silently approaching this topic in a high profile manner. And like i mentioned earlier, we got plenty of positive encouragement. However your insistence at implying we were just a bunch of angry Black women is an old, tired trope that has been attempted for decades by people with more influence and power than you. Next.

      Please go read Michaela’s initial comments about Essence’s hiring. She herself stated she was ANGRY. Therefore, if this demonstration was inspired by MAD, it DID have an element of anger in it. Again because a white woman was hired. And let me say this: I find it extremely ironic that you and others who have claimed on the one hand that black women aren’t monolithic or identical in tastes, beliefs, etc believe on the other hand that one black woman could’ve represented us “better” when it comes to FASHION. But I thought we weren’t all the same?

      YOU: I knew that was your problem-lol. So THERE is the rub once again, another non-Black Woman all upsetted because Black girls got together to strategize. I read the same thing on another message board yesterday, folks mad because non-Black women were not present at the protest. I don’t know if that was the request by the organizers–shrug–But the light, brown and dark Black girls were there in our freaking glory, IMO it would not have bothered me if Latina, Asian, etc. were present but guess what-it would have been a different protest. And since it was conceived and organized by Black women, that is who showed up.

      This is where you lost the one iota of respect for your comments I had. You took a facetious comment Akai made to ME and degraded it. You erroneously assigned bigoted sentiments to Akai’s remarks and belittled them by attaching your own separatist views. Perhaps YOU should do some research into the ancestral background and history of Latinas, and you will find a mix of African ancestry, indigenous people, etc. Yes, AFRICAN. Yes, BLACK. This portion of your comment was just plain shameful.

      I’ve read and heard numerous articles and interviews where Michaela supports the perpetual black victim mentality. Instead of holding the rappers accountable for their derogatory descriptions of women, she blames “white patriarchal male society.” Actually I think she’s pretty much blamed them for the majority of issues black people face. In a recent interview on a Canadian radio show, she complained that there weren’t any black APPLICANTS for a position. I repeat APPLICANTS. And she used this example to try and support her stance of the lack of diversity in the fashion industry. I could go on but I won’t .

      That’s my 2 cents and I’m entitled to it, as is Akai and anyone else who agrees or disagrees with you or Michaela. And certainly no one is going to bring me down a notch.

    • avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

      @Leah: Your response was on point and pretty much covered everything.

      You’re better than me as I’ve little patience for reactionaries who, obviously, failed to comprehend what I wrote and put their own insecurities and spin on it. …I stopped reading and ignored when she kept insisting I used the word “sucka”! *giggle*

    • avatar Leah says:

      Thanks Akai. I didn’t mean to or want to speak for you (and apologize if that’s how it seemed) but I share your opinions on this and couldn’t sit back & let the buffoonery go on. My “patience” (or am I sucka for headaches? lol) is a double edged sword sometimes.

  8. avatar Interested says:

    So now Black women are racists for wanting the same opportunites that other races of women have?

    • avatar DelphineBlue says:

      Black people working together unnerves quite a few people. They know it’s not racism, but it’s the easiest word to use instead of saying what really frightens them.

    • avatar Angie says:

      The leader of this protest Michaela Angela Davis, has an established history of downright racism towards white people. During the Haiti earthquake crisis, she stated her discontent with white people adopting black Haitian babies. She would’ve rather seen them stay in the dilapidated orphanages, on the streets and suffer indefinitely than have a white family bring them into their homes and families.

      How can this protest be interpreted any differently or carry any merit when the person at the center of it holds such sentiments about white people?

  9. avatar Alexandra says:

    This is a “waste” of a protest in my opinion. There are so many things affecting Black women today, and “European Fashion” not one of them. C’mon.
    I think its great these sistas got together and staged an organized protest, but why not protest demands for better health, or the amount of unhealthy food shops in low-income (predominately Black) neighborhoods? Protest why Black women get abortions at high rates, and why there are so many planned parenthood’s in Black areas, or why Black women don’t make as much as others? Protest for better schools, better housing and all that stuff.

    I’m all for a ‘Black girl movement’ as long as its about black women (young & old) taking care of themselves (health-wise), bettering education and supporting others. Not fashion. Give me a break.

    • People go to school for Fashion, their called Art Schools, or Institutions. Have you thought ‘the reason why so many Black girls, and women are doing poorly for themselves is because they cant(and dont) see themselves as doing any better than just’? Black people, in general, are underrepresented, in fashion, the arts, in life. If these women decide they want to break the ‘silence’ by holding a protest that exemplifies how they feel about European faces being shoved in their minds telling them what’s beautiful, and what they’ll never be, then more power to them.

      “It always funny how people think they are exempt from fashion, when the items you’ve selected to wear were chosen for you(from the people in this room) from a pile of stuff”
      -Devil Wears Prada

      And, guess what all the faces in that room were WHITE. So, the question is Who’s representing you?

    • avatar DelphineBlue says:

      And the women who were in this protest don’t care about the health issues of Black women,–explain to me how you know this?

      As i mentioned to another one, i was one of the women who walked with this protest. We heard so many positive comments from the crowds, it was pretty cool that people were supportive of our efforts to address this issue.

      FYI–It wasn’t about the right to wear pretty clothes and put on makeup. Fashion is HUGE business, and generates a lot of revenue for NYC, and beyond. For the Black people (models, designers, makeup artists, photogs, press, etc) who work in this industry, why should they not have the same representation as everyone else? So you really think Tracy Reese is the only talented Black designer out here, while the NYTimes writes articles about the emergence of Asian American designers in the last few years (many of them under 30). Just because you think it’s frivolous (and perhaps you are unable to regard more than one issue at a time so you think it applies to everyone else?), does not mean it’s not an important issue to others.

    • avatar Alexandra says:

      Timothy, I somewhat agree with you. I do know that black women are underrepresented, & I’m happy that many black women of today are waking up & no longer following the European standard. But I just think it was not as important as other issues.
      Even if there wasn’t a Euro standard, an African one or an Asian one, would still be just as harmful to the self-esteem of some.

      “[the reason why so many Black girls, and women are doing poorly for themselves is because they cant(and dont) see themselves as doing any better than just’?]”

      Yes, I know what you mean. But fashion is not 100% blame for why some Black women/girls may feel inferior. White women run & own the industry & control their images; but that doesn’t stop some white women from self-esteem issues that may mostly affect them.
      The real issue is the sterotypes & negative portrayals. Like look at this recent : “Act Da Fool” & “Gabourey’s Elle cover”. Some people complain about the lack of Black women in fashion, but when they are in, it’s not the image some Black people like. (See comments)
      I think it actually would’ve been better had they protested about the negative images of Black females in American media, which goes way beyond the states.

      Like I said before, I liked that they planned an organized & peaceful protest. But not the idea of the protest itself.

    • avatar Alexandra says:

      And the women who were in this protest don’t care about the health issues of Black women,–explain to me how you know this?

      As i mentioned to another one, i was one of the women who walked with this protest. We heard so many positive comments from the crowds, it was pretty cool that people were supportive of our efforts to address this issue.

      FYI–It wasn’t about the right to wear pretty clothes and put on makeup. Fashion is HUGE business, and generates a lot of revenue for NYC, and beyond. For the Black people (models, designers, makeup artists, photogs, press, etc) who work in this industry, why should they not have the same representation as everyone else? So you really think Tracy Reese is the only talented Black designer out here, while the NYTimes writes articles about the emergence of Asian American designers in the last few years (many of them under 30). Just because you think it’s frivolous (and perhaps you are unable to regard more than one issue at a time so you think it applies to everyone else?), does not mean it’s not an important issue to others.

      Delphine; Where did I say, that I knew, that these women didnt care about the health issues of Black women? I said that it would’ve been better had they protested about health issues affecting Black women or others. You’re talking about things, I never even mentioned in my OP. I never said you shouldn’t care. That’s nice you received positive comments.
      Lack of non-white faces in Fashion should be challenged/discussed, but not as much as other issues. That’s my opinion.

    • avatar Miya says:

      My thoughts exactly, Alexandra. As a community we need to be more strategic about what we go to war for. Otherwise it lessens the power and potential of future demonstrations. We have gotten way too trivial about what we consider grievances. Fashion – is a bit lower on the priority pole, if you ask me. I dig fashion and I rock the current trends and all, but I agree with you that if we are going to rally, then it should be for issues that desperately affect us – HIV, joblessness, education, etc.

  10. avatar Joanne Holmes says:

    I am so very very proud of these young beautiful women. They are an inspiration to so many young women of color.

  11. avatar Interested says:

    Akai, I respectfully asked you a question. I am not here to fight with you, if that is what you think. I am hear trying to support Black women/girls. Does that offend you? Does it bother you? You are obviously very intelligent, and I would like us to have a dialogue about this. So why have you ignored me?

    • avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

      I try to make a habit of ignoring what I feel are racial separatists, those who make erroneous accusations i.e. “dismiss any pointing out of anti-Black female racism” etc. I prefer open-minded and that’s a brick wall I’ve no time for or interest in it!

      No one is empowered by someone filling their heads full of hyperbole and a narrative that they are hated, incapable, downtrodden, the ultimate victim oh boo-hoo etc.

  12. Moving piece… I like it. I certainly didn’t think this would make a difference to Black people, considering we know what it’s like to pushed away based on the color of our ancestors. Good for them; Standing up for what they believe in. Funny thing is, I was unaware that Fashion only has one place for a colored director, and she happens to be Nina Garcia, of Project Runway. Not to mention she sits on a panel of one minority, I still never saw her one. This is the world we live in, and it’s up to us to change it.

  13. avatar NiCole says:

    NiCole says:
    September 17, 2010 at 2:40 am
    This is a waste of protest. Especially since this magazine is OWNED by white people. Essence magazine is white owned and constantly fuels negativity into the black community. This magazine is nothing more than an outlet for whites to continue to do what they always do. Brainwash and keep their bullshit statics going.There are constantly articles about colorism, black women vs. black men, light skin and corporate America, black women having AIDs and black men in jail. The models should have been doing a general protest. Why do black people feel so passionate about businesses that are not even OWNED by blacks. A mess! They should have been protesting Shouler’s debasment of black teens.

    Essence is a piece of shit magazine. Do these beautiful young women know that the white female that runs this recently claimed that she is sick of catering to a bunch of “angry black women???” The issue is not about a black fashion editor. That is so stupid. There are black editors on staff but this magazine is owned by TIME Inc. GOOGLE is their friend! They are mad because a white woman is on staff now…LOL. She should be anrgy at who owns this mess and is perpetuating negativity. Simple.

  14. avatar V says:

    I always find it interesting when people want to claim that racism is not alive, can LIST the number of minorities doing something, and it is usually less than 10. The fact that we CAN list them is problematic. The fact that there are 10 or so and we think that is sufficient it problematic. Someone listed a few models as evidence of “openness” in the fashion industry. Yeah right.

    Essence magazine is pure. garbage and I hope everyone who works there reads this. When they suggested black women find potential mates at strip clubs is when I decided this magazine does not speak to or for me. And apparently there are loads of white people working at Essence.

    I don’t know why black people feel the need to be “inclusive” and ‘post racial.” when the majority feels no such desire “Oh we’re not racist massa. Look we got whites here.”

    Essence.can.suck.it.

  15. [...] the opening day of New York Fashion week a group of black women staged a protest over Essence‘s hiring of a white fashion director and the lack of black fashion directors at [...]

  16. avatar teachermrw says:

    I’m all for protest, but, why at NY Fashion Week? What did the two things have to do with each other?

  17. avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

    Kim wrote: “I can say that people are none to happy to have you around in positions of influence and control.”
    ******************************************************************************************************************

    Really? I mean, really? If your perception is that people are “none to happy to have you around,” I don’t doubt it and you shouldn’t be surprised or upset by that.

    Being bitter, petty, angry and continually stalking behind people to ‘say’ things like “you are a hypocrite” (as you did to Beauty Is Diverse) and “you really are a joke” (as you did to moi) – just because they see things differently or don’t have the same opinion as you — makes it very clear why no one would want “to have you around” period, let alone in any position of influence or control!

    Adios!

    • avatar Kim says:

      Oh. The little girl is upset. LOL! And that is why you will never be in that position of influence and control unless you are feeding off of the backs of AA women. I’m doing quite well as an MD/JD. I control my own destiny. Your dislike for AA women is so intense it radiates through the information high way. The balck girl could be Little Bo Peep and you would still find something wrong.

    • avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

      Whatevah you say (or lie you attempt to make others believe about being an MD, JD), trick! Really…I believe you! *giggle*
      <x
      Obviously I own you…else you wouldn't stay tugging at my thong, commenting behind me and all up in my stuff!

  18. avatar Akai Is a TROLL says:

    Read the Name and stop entertaining her/his/its foolishness.

    On to the next one.

    • avatar Leah says:

      I’d really like to know what you & Kim base your accusations on that Akai is a troll and has prejudices against black women, when in fact she doesn’t exhibit standard “trollish” behaviors but offers information, insight and even cites news media in her responses. And how is she biased against AA women? Because she doesn’t agree with the fodder that’s fed by the likes of Michaela Angela Davis?? Because she acknowledges that racism DOES exist in the world but doesn’t support bigotry BY ANYONE? Baseless and degrading accusations of someone being a troll or having racist tendencies shouldn’t be thrown around nonchalantly. It’s not a good look for either of you or Clutch.

    • avatar Akai (Akai.Santiago@Yahoo) says:

      @Leah: Let’s ignore these h**!

      Some of this is probably my fault, so e-mail me!

    • Cleo Hines says:

      It’s based on the fact the she disagrees with their points of view and dares to call people out on bullsh!t aka the victim mentality being displayed. Fashion? I mean really, fashion? This is something that is purely elective people! C’mon now really, if black women of any stripe want to be taken seriously we need to put our power behind real issues, otherwise our numbers and voices become meaningless.

      This was such a bloody waste of time, effort and the tips of 4 inch stiletto heels. get behind a better school system for our schools to make sure that our children graduate and are able to compete on a college level and the world stage. Spend all that effort on HIV/STD education for our young women who are the fastest growing segment of newly contracted HIV cases in this country. Get behind better, more affordable housing for poor and low income families and better/low cost health services for our communities, and I could go on and on and on. Really, just a blasted waste of time. we need to know where our priorities lie people.

  19. avatar Clnmike says:

    Glad to see the ladies taking a stand. If Essence is going to be a magazine that caters to a specific group, in this black women, it should set an example across the board in the magazine and behind the scenes..

  20. avatar LisaP says:

    Some people don’t want to let go of black victim mentality and Michaela Angela Davis is one of them. It’s how she makes a name for herself these days because let’s be honest, no one’s checking for her to do anything with fashion anymore. She would have no platform if she gave up on the downtrodden black victim frame of mind. Plus it’s always been a way to prove her “blackness” despite her very pale complexion and green eyes.

    The truth is that white people have always been involved in everything from black publications to tv shows to colleges. Both Girlfriends and The Game were produced by Kelsey Grammar. Yeah the white guy who’s best known for playing Frazer. I don’t think anyone would argue that because there was a white guy at the helm of these shows, they didn’t cater to their target demographics or become less black.

    The other truth is Michaela has had a long standing beef with Angela, Essence’s EIC. Angela fired Michaela and best believe, Michaela’s still pissed! It’s this beef that drove her to not give Angela the benefit of the doubt that she poured through countless resumes and vetted qualified black professionals. It’s that beef that drove Michaela to disrespect and publicly lay into Angela and her decision to hire Placas. Michaela has an axe to grind with Angela and saw this as the perfect opportunity to do it.

Leave a Comment

  • We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
  • Please keep comments related to topic.
  • Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.

Daily Blog - News.Gossip.Info