24

Maya Angelou Says MLK Memorial “Minimizes the Man”

Friday Sep 2, 2011 – by

Almost troubled from its inception, the completion of the Martin Luther King memorial statue is accompanied with a measure of bitterness, when seen through the lens of Maya Angelou. The prolific poet and author has expressed her disapproval of the abbreviated quotation that was selected to be etched in the stone of the King’s long awaited memorial, saying it makes him sound like “an arrogant twit” which “minimizes the man.”

The original quote was derived from a sermon King delivered on February 4, 1968, at Ebenezer Baptist Church, two months before he was assassinated, about the eulogy that could be given when he died, MSNBC reports.

In his words:

“Yes, if you want to say that I was a drum major, say that I was a drum major for justice. Say that I was a drum major for peace. I was a drum major for righteousness. And all of the other shallow things will not matter.”

The paraphrased version found on the statue is as followed:

 

“I was a drum major for justice, peace and righteousness.”

 

In regards to the above quote, Angelou has gone on record stating “He was anything but [a twit],” Angelou, 83, told the Washington Post. “He was far too profound a man for that four-letter word to apply. He had no arrogance at all. He had a humility that comes from deep inside. The ‘if’ clause that is left out is salient. Leaving it out changes the meaning completely.”

She also said the inscription “makes him seem like an egotist.”

In defense of Angelou’s criticism, Ed Jackson Jr., executive architect of the memorial, replied, “We sincerely felt passionate that the man’s own eulogy should be expressed on the stone. We said the least we could do was define who he was based on his perception of himself: ‘I was a drum major for this, this and this.’”

Time Magazine reports that Angelou was not only a friend of Dr. King, but one of the memorial’s Council of Historians tasked with selecting the inscriptions for the memorial, however according to Jackson, she did not attend the scheduled meetings to discuss inscriptions.

Jackson goes on to say, “If there’s any comment about anything, it’s late,” he said, noting others also have recently criticized pieces of the memorial. “I think it’s rather small of folks to pick at things. … This has been going on for 14 years, and all of them have had plenty of time to add their thoughts and ideas.”

Washington’s monument to Martin Luther King Jr. has been met with stern criticism from the very beginning – from commissioning a sculptor from China, to the “so-called” stern mannerism of the statue, which many complained was a misrepresentation the famed civil right leader – concluding with Angelou’s insightful observation in regards to the inscription. The following quote from Dr. King may best accompany this bittersweet moment of history, and provide some  closure:

“We must accept finite disappointment, but never lose infinite hope.”

 

24 Comments – Add Yours

  1. avatar iQgraphics says:

    yeah, but its the principle of a memorial. if you’re going to quote someone, don’t paraphrase on a memorial…
    I mean, really, why…
    That’s a really big slab of stone. One of his complete sermons could have fit on the side

  2. avatar ms_micia says:

    Want the true essence of a memorial to MLK. Go to Atlanta, GA. #thatisall

  3. avatar LaNeshe says:

    They definitely watered down the quote. If it was an issue of space I’m sure there are shorter exact quotes they could have used.

  4. avatar SAA says:

    I don’t understand why she is complaining after the fact. The planning of this statue has been going on for YEARS. They invited her to the meetings to select the inscriptions yet she did not attend a single one. Maybe she had other obligations (every single meeting?) but it seems that if he was a good friend to her and the memorial meant a lot to her she would’ve taken an active role in the planning rather than criticizing AFTER the fact.

    • avatar bosslady says:

      I agree. Her point is fair regarding the quote being taken out of context, but why complain NOW when it has been an ongoing process for years and she was privileged enough to be able to contribute, had she wished.

      I do however think that they could have chosen a better quote to reflect his legacy.

  5. avatar Me27 says:

    I agree with Maya Angelou. After reading the entire quote, the paraphrased version totally minimizes his statement and his legacy. And I’m with iQgraphics, what was the point of paraphrasing? If you are going to erect a monument in someone’s honor, at least put a direct quote.

  6. avatar Pink says:

    Maya means well; but it’s been reported that she was on the committee and never attended any of the meetings. If that’s true….then Maya you have no say now. You should have been there to give your input when it counted. And I don’t care what the statue saids; we all know what MLK stood for.

    • avatar d_nicegirl says:

      I think that’s her point. We don’t ALL know what he stood for, so he should have been quoted accurately. To those who don’t know, the paraphrased quote does make him appear to have been arrogant. The word ‘if’ was pivotal. That being said, Ms. Angelou should have attended at least one meeting.

  7. If Maya didn’t attend the meetings than that is highly unfortunate. But her insight is still on point. I don’t believe in paraphrasing quotes. It robs the quote of it’s very essence.

  8. avatar Real Thought says:

    What she and the rest of black people need to complain about more than anything is the fact that this memorial was made by the Chinese including the materials and the actual artist himself. With black male unemployment soaring to 18% as just reported in August’s employment numbers this committee decision to outsource American and black labor to the Chinese is a slap in the face and to the legacy of Dr. King.

    Sadly Dr. King died while fighting for the rights of black men to work here in America. Sadly the black committee headed by Harry Johnson (yes that is his real name) chose not to employ a black artist or an American artist to represent our (Dr. King’s) legacy. This in my opinion will force me not to celebrate this slap in the face to the black community. If you want to promote a real story Clutch, promote that one and not what Mya Angelou has been worked up about.

    Check the video for more info

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDv5enNKpQI&feature=player_embedded

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDv5enNKpQI&feature=player_embedded

  9. avatar Real Thought says:

    The statue wasn’t even created by a person of color. Like so many things this project was outsourced to the Chinese. Sadly Dr. King was killed while he was actually fighting for the rights for black men to work her in America……….. but yet committee chose NOT TO employ black men to build this project. That is disgusting.

    This is the real story that should be made a big, not what Mya Angelou is upset about (although it still has merit).

    Artist Gilbert Young breaks it down.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDv5enNKpQI&feature=player_embedded

  10. At first I thought why is my girl tripping? But after reading this, I totally get her point of view. At the same time, I have to agree with what many of you have said, this has been going on for years and she should have spoken on this during the fact not after the fact. Especially since she was encouraged to by being put on the committee.

    At this point it just looks like Black on Black hating… i.e. here goes our laundry being broadcasted again.

  11. avatar Laina says:

    There have been so many comments about the memorial on the Internet and tv. The fact is a group of fraternity men got together and decided there should be a memorial to Dr. King in DC. They had to get approval to place the memorial in Washington, plan the memorial and raise money for the memorial. How much did you give?? There was nothing to stop anyone else from coming up with a plan, raising money and deciding on the inscriptions, etc. Perhaps there could have been several plans and the powers that be in Washington would then have to select one plan. As far as I know, there weren’t a bunch of groups planning a memorial to Dr. King. It is very easy to complain about the end result at the end. Where was everyone in the beginning? The involvement of Chinese in the process is old news. The reality is most people complaining about the Asian issue probably didn’t give a dime to the memorial and don’t have an issue going to Asian owned stores on a regular basis that only hire Hispanics and handing over their money to them. The reality is even if they selected Americans for the stone cutting, etc, African Americans have been shut out of that industry also.

  12. avatar Clnmike says:

    ” however according to Jackson, she did not attend the scheduled meetings to discuss inscriptions.”

    I’m not buying that BS, she has to be present for you to understand not to cheapen a beautiful quote on a huge stone which you have more than enough room to put the whole thing on? They teach you how to properly quote some one in middle school and a bunch of grown men cant get it right? She has to be there to make sure you use common sense? What are they like 10 year old? You got a giant piece of rock up there, all the room in the world to right that down. Hell no, a bunch of idiots.

    • avatar Penny says:

      I totally agree. She did not need to be present for them to do the right thing. They need to be embarrassed.

  13. avatar Timcampi says:

    “Martin Luther King Jr. has been met with stern criticism from the very beginning – from commissioning a sculptor from China,”

    -_____- really….

  14. avatar sli says:

    What’s done is done. Complaining is not going to change it. If Ms. Angelou was invited to be a part of the council whose specific task was to SELECT THE INSCRIPTION, and she chose not to share her wisdom on the matter, then publicly nitpicking it now is dishonoring the memorial and the people who worked diligently on it for years.

  15. avatar ross says:

    what’s up with the humongus lips repectible to his face

  16. avatar S. says:

    It’s okay Black folks, it’s not like it’s been written in st… wait a minute O_o

  17. avatar S. says:

    HOLY CRAP :O

    I didn’t realize it was on the *main* stone! *shocked face*

    Yea, that’s TOTALLY unacceptable!

  18. avatar jenna says:

    the only thing that disturbed me about this monument was hearing that it cost something like $120 million to make it happen. the alphas and other involved parties could have donated that cash to a cause to help the black community get back on track, wouldn’t King have preferred that instead of a huge stone monument that accomplishes what… money from tourism that likely does not benefit the black community in any way shape or form?

  19. avatar opinionatedgal says:

    I agree with Ms. Angelou. Dr. King was a prolific speaker and the full quote should have been used, the context is so different from the paraphrased quote on the memorial. The abbreviated quote sounds a bit trivial, the full quote is captivating.

    I am, however, so happy that there is a memorial for Dr. King in Washington. The last time I went there, on the Monument Mall, as an adult, I was surprised that there was no representation of him or the African American experience in the mall. There was even a monument to Native Americans, understandably so, but nothing for Martin Luther King, who revolutionized civil rights in this country and the world. I will definitely be make another trip to see the Dr. King Memorial. Perhaps they will consider modifying the monument to include that complete quote.

  20. avatar jasmine says:

    I agree with miss Angelo 100%!

Leave a Comment

  • We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
  • Please keep comments related to topic.
  • Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.

Daily Blog - News.Gossip.Info