Charismatic intellectual Cornel West continued his oligarchy/plutocracy diatribe on MSNBC Tuesday, asserting that the Republican Party in essence is “mean, coldhearted and tied to oligarchs,” and Democrats were “spineless” and unwilling to fight them, Raw Story reports.

Not solely focusing his blunt critique on “brotha” Barack, West spoke critically of the 2 party political system as a whole. Citing corporate greed as a key source of corruption for American politics, and the entire landscape of the United States as a result.

The renowned scholar who, along side Ralph Nader, is personally seeking a Democratic presidential candidate to oppose Barack Obama went on to say,

“The top 10 percent got 100 percent of income growth. That’s pathological. You can’t sustain a democracy when you have that kind of wealth inequality. You just can’t… The greed is running amok. Somebody has to be honest and tell the truth. The problem is the Democratic Party is still too tied to big money.”

Echoing a sentiment shared by many about the Democratic party’s rep for being backbone-free, West said President Obama “is going to have some spine, but it could be a two-step… It could be a speech for progressives, then move back to the center.”

For more, dig the full interview on MSNBC:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Tags: ,
Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter
  • TheBestAnonEver, Part 2

    All this because Obama did not call him. Wow. If only Obama knew that not calling West would make him this cranky, I am sure he would have made time from being the leader of the free world.

    Obama is not my favorite person, but I often think back to the black establishment’s hesitancy to support him initially because he was not descended from slaves and wonder if there is still some residual effect (although they had no qualms supporting Hilary Clinton whom also did not descend from slaves. SMH). Would they have been more willing to forgive him, for all his perceived wrongs, if they considered him “one of them”?