I am evolving. The more I live each day, the more I realize that love has limitless potential and wider expressions than what’s presented as the social norm: monogamous relationships. I’ve realized that I’m capable of loving many people, but all in different ways. I love some more deeply than others. Some are strictly lovers, and I appreciate the physical pleasure that they bring into my life. Others are good friends, and I appreciate the companionship that they offer my journey. And others are both, making them prime candidates for life partnership, which requires the deepest, most unconditional love. At this point in my life, I feel more supported, loved, and appreciated than ever by the men in my life. All of them are aware that I’m seeing other people, but more importantly, they know that I’ve been questioning whether or not monogamy really is the right path for me.
The truth is that I battle with non-monogamy. I like the concept of polyamory, intellectually, as it’s a transparent answer to most humans’ tendencies to be non-monogamous and a valid experience of love. But I’m also wary of its longevity in my personal life, in the same way that I feel about monogamous relationships. At times I feel monogamous, like my heart was made to romantically revolve around one individual and nothing else matters. At times I feel polyamorous, like I want to openly have one life partner but many lovers.
Most of my women friends lean to the monogamous side, and reply with confusion when I genuinely say that I wouldn’t mind having a long-term open relationship. Personally, I don’t equate monogamy with partnership, as monogamy is one type of commitment and one of my lower priorities when it comes to a long-term relationship. I’m more concerned with knowing that my life partner is my best friend, protector, and confidant. I want there to be a space in our relationship for the acknowledgement of outside attractions, and if we desire, the permission to act upon those desires.
But I’ve noticed that many women have a sincere fear of their partner leaving them for another. And while they might be interested in exploring a relationship with someone else, they’ll dismiss that desire in exchange for their partner not receiving the freedom to act upon similar interests. I find that polyamory is often discussed as a “man’s dream” in women’s circles, dismissing the advantages and pleasures that it also offers women. There are so many women who have closed themselves to the idea of more than one man or woman committed to loving, supporting, and pleasuring them in life, despite the fact that it has historically benefited us more in terms of relationship balance and life fulfillment.
These are some of the thoughts that have been on my mind for quite some time. But I am not advocating polyamory over monogamy or vice versa. I simply want to have a conversation that goes without popular stereotypes and misunderstandings of both lifestyles. Monogamy has its benefits, as does polyamory. And both have disadvantages as well. But I do find it interesting that the only type of relationship that most people consider from childhood is a monogamous one. It’s not the only way.
What are your thoughts on monogamous versus polyamorous love? How do you imagine long-term partnership? And where do you rank monogamy or polyamory on your list of priorities? Speak on it.
Very interesting article and discussion.
* a week later on clutch*
“a new study asks why so many people getting infected with STDS”
*comment section*
” this is madness! how come 90% of the population now has herpes and gonorrhea?” “we needs to raise awareness of this!” “why is everybody dropping like flies?”
hmmmmmm
haha very true- I’m calling next week there will be at the very least one article on marraige and why/ how its necessary. Oh wait a minute….I think there was actually one today.
AA women need to be brought to heel, if this is how they think on average. Our women must be chaste or damn well near it in order to be taken serious as potential mates. Unfortunately, this is not a requirement of men, but equality is a myth itself. But I digress.
Polygamy, yes; but hyper-sexuality, no. Polygamy, if we must practice it, should reflect how we practiced it in Africa. There, a man could only marry as many women as he could reasonably provide for. Furthermore, polygamy as it was practiced in Africa was more to with providing women with husbands and children with families than an abundance of sex, which I am not objecting to. There, no woman was left without a husband’s love and devotion, which she received only after she surrendered her heart to her husband.
Carry on, peasants.
i am 42 years old and have been married over 15 years…there has been infidelity in my marriage throughout those years…but we still love and care for each other…we still respect each other as individuals…we have talked about divorce…we have talked about our shortcomings that have nothing to do with the other…i don’t consider my marriage as been polygamous…we are only married to each other…we have a monogamous marriage…i feel that the whole idea of a polygamous (open) marriage is an attempt to create some protection mechanism so we can deal with being imperfect, being married to or loving an imperfect person, and knowing that because you opened your heart to love that imperfect person, that same person may break your heart…the you feel in a monogamous relationship is a jealous type love and you don’t want to feel the pain of betrayal…if you search deep in your heart & mind you know that when someone who you know loves you cheats, they are not cheating because they don’t love you…unfortunately, just because people and situations disappoint us, we should not try to change the reality of what is in our hearts…the writer of this article even admits that sometimes she longs for the monogamous…for me it is similar to death, we all know it happens but it hurts everytime we lose someone we love…but we don’t stop having babies to bring in new life that we know is going to die eventually and we don’t stop loving…should be fight to create things and situations that we think will bring us less pain or should be strive to embrace finding “courage to know the things we can change and wisdom to know the difference.”
@Palmtree. Not exactly. I believed that his article and the ensuing discussion, in the beginning anyway, was about “open relationships.” Not Polyarmory. I know nothing about Polyamory. All I know is that polyamory is a formalized kind of melange of partners with varying up front arrangements. An “open relationship,” on the other hand, is a simple understanding between all of those involved, that there are no exclusivity committments. Everyone is free to do whatever and whomever they want. They can even become entangled in deep emotional relationships, sex or no sex, with others. It doesn’t matter. No one cares. It is a form of non-exclusivity. A lack of commitment. A type of brutal honesty. And you are either with it, or you are not. The tricky part is that if you are with it, then you have committed to be un-committed, and thus, have no right to kick and scream at any of your partners for doing what they want. Why? Because you are in an open relationship. In an open relationship, people try to enjoy each other for what they bring to the table and not for what they HOPE that person will bring to the table in the future. It is a formalized lack of exclusivity and can be quite challenging emotionally across the board. It is taxing in a way that monogamy is not, because everyone throws the towel in, right away. They don’t even try to be faithful to one person because they just don’t feel they can or they don’t completely love and trust any one of their partners enough to commit. This is jaded and incredibly forthright. Why? Because both men and women want to be told that they are the “only one.” In many ways, we want to be lied to. Or, we at least want the object of our affection to match our level of feelings for them and try to commit and be exclusive. Sometimes when someone commits, they commit with their heart — forever. Sometimes they just “do the best that they can.” When you accept that your partner or partners are involved with other people, you have accepted an “open relationship.”
“there has been infidelity in my marriage throughout those years…but we still love and care for each other…we still respect each other as individuals…we have talked about divorce…we have talked about our shortcomings that have nothing to do with the other…i don’t consider my marriage as been polygamous…we are only married to each other…we have a monogamous marriage”
therefore, you have a monogamous marriage. you did/do NOT have a monogamous sexual relationship. people confuse the two or rather assume that they got/get/have a package deal.
“they are not cheating because they don’t love you”
depends on how the person defines “love.” i think a lot of women would beg to differ.
I think this is a great discussion because sexuality and love come in different forms. But I find it interesting that people are on here trying to define something that they don’t know anything about. unless you are practicing an open relationship or polyamory or polygamy or swinging, how can you try to tell people what it is or isn’t?, don’t try to define it and don’t google it either for a definition!
I have been involved in various forms of polyamory/open relationships for years now. Each one was different and the terms of the relationship were worked out from the beginning. Just like with any other relationship, sometimes things can work out, and sometimes they don’t. Sometimes people catch feelings or lie, sometimes the people involved are open and honest and everyone gets what they want and need sexually and emotionally. It’s not just about smashing somebody and going home. It’s not just about being greedy. Its about people defining their own kind of relationship in order to bring them fulfillment. To hell with what everyone else thinks.
Bottom a line, a relationship is between the people involved whether its an open relationship or a monogamous one. and it’s nobody else’s business what the people want to do and choose to do.
I am not trying to be too simplistic here, but if polyamory is the cure for what ails us in terms of relationships, wouldn’t people have already embraced this solution? I mean, there have been “free love” movements as far back as the 1700′s (before effective birth control!) and none of those caught on. The concept of monogamy has worked, and worked well, for centuries of human existence; why is it no longer viable?
Do you see polyamory as the next logical step in social evolution, one that will occur as people get smarter?
I’m not being glib when I ask this question. I am actually curious as to how you view the prospects of polyamory catching on, and, the reasons you think it will become popular.
it has worked well enough long as people want monogamy and think that they are in a monogamous [sexual] relationship.
also, you have to define monogamy–which is why i keep inserting “[sexual]”
it seems to me that most people want to own each other–especially each other’s genitalia (LOL). and they are afraid of being alone. we live in fairytales.. or at least they are sold to us.
Don’t think its a cure for what ails us in terms of relationships, but I don’t think that there is only one type of relationship that can work for people and should be accepted.
I don’t know if polyamory is the next logical step, but I do think that some aspects of polyamory (open communication, living in reality vs. fairy tales) should be the basis of all relationships no matter what kind they are.
And why do you say that the concept of monogamy worked well so far?
Wow, so everyone’s just gonna assume polyamory is about sex and monogamy is clearly about building a strong relationship? I don’t think that’s how it works… Like at all. Polyamory can be something cleverly disguised as a close friendship. Intimacy does not always mean conjoined loins.
But even if it is, what’s the problem? I mean it worked for the bonobos and we’re really not that different.
@ Timcampi,
Girrrrrrrl what in the world is a bonobos?! Or are they a special species of the humankind?!
It may very well be that Im just unsufferably naive but I cant even BEGIN to wrap my brain around polyamory. The whole idea completely confounds me! I read most of the comments in hopes of some explanation and found none. I dont think Im capable of the mental and emotional acrobatics required for such a thing!
But I will say this, I certainly understand the motive behind polyamory. Its damn near impossible to find someone who can give you even half of the things you need. I swear celibacy is looking better and better EVERY SINGLE DAY!!!
“Celibacy is looking better and better EVERY SINGLE DAY!!!”
Second this to the tenth power square..
Third….I agree as well. Have we completely given up on the concept of a one on one relationship or are we just too lazy to put in the effort to make this type of relationship work anymore?
I weep for our future…hell I weep now
@VonnaB
“I weep for our future…hell I weep now.”
I was thinking the same thing reading this article….and most of the comments.
@Trini- no you’re not naive for not being able to wrap your mind around it.
@Vonna B- I do not weep but can only shake my head in amazement and slight disgust. I definitely believe its a laziness that stems from people being less socialized as we are now able to live our lives from behind a computer/ cell phone screen and not interact with anyone on a personal level. Platforms like twitter and facebook give people an over-inflated sense of ego and importance and the feelings of others take second road to that individuals wants and desires.
I think the author was trying to speak to polyamorous relationships but it came out sounding more like an open-relationship. Based on her experiences it doesn’t sound like she’s had either of those but rather she’s just sleeping with whomever her heart desires…which is fine I guess but it’s not an open relationship or polyamory.
Arielle said something that was very curious to me though;
*”There are so many women who have closed themselves to the idea of more than one man or woman committed to loving, supporting, and pleasuring them in life, despite the fact that it has historically benefited us more in terms of relationship balance and life fulfillment.”* Thats a really bold claim.
@ Trini
It sure is! 3 years celibate.
@Whatever
BRAVO!!!
Come to think of it, I’d love to read an article about your experience with that so far! You should write one!
Monogamy is learned behavior, I’ll admit that. It’s not natural to only want to be with one person. However, this doesn’t mean that it’s not possible. Self control is something that we all have to learn. Most of us want one person that we can love unconditionally and we don’t want to share. I don’t care how “acceptable” open relationships become. I’m not down. If I love someone I’m not sharing. If I’m willing to share, you’re not that important to me.
http://www.RealityUnscripted.com
@Runscripted
i’ve found this website to be particularly useful in sorting out my thoughts and feelings on non-monogamy. i thought you might enjoy it too. (of course i’m a bit biased as its written by my wife : ) seriously though, we’ve explored many of the edges, distinctions and issues you start to raise above, and the site is our contribution back to others: http://www.redefiningmonogamy.com
Why do people keep exchanging Love with Sexual Attraction. Love is not Sexual Attraction, you love your parents, but you aren’t going to sleep with them (I hope), no matter how polyamorous you are.
My points.
1. OFCOURSE ”monogamy” is not the only way. Humans can, like Animals behave any way they want. However, the big difference is, unlike Animals, we have Responsibility. We can choose, and must be responsible for whatever choice taken.
2. The Human body is one of limited resources, if you want to dedicate your resources to sex, don’t be alarmed when you have a reduced ability to do other things. Mental health issues, Sexual Health issues, Physical health issues, you name it.
3. Now, if your choice is to be polyamorous, please weigh the risks, be informed about your choice at the very least.