It seems like people are still debating whether or not Chris Brown should have been allowed to triumphantly return to the scene of the crime the Grammys.
While many in the Twitterverse were both appalled he was allowed to perform (twice!) and thrilled to see him on the show, after winning a golden statue, Breezy took to Twitter to give his haters a message:
“HATE ALL U WANT BECUZ I GOT A GRAMMY Now! That’s the ultimate FUCK OFF!”
Sensing that perhaps he’d said something wrong, Brown (or his inept PR team) deleted the tweet and replaced it with something a little more humble: “IM BACK SO WATCH MY BaCK as I walk away from all this negativity #teambreezygrammy.”
While many have jumped to Brown’s defense, I can’t help be continue to give the young pop star the side-eye. Nothing about Brown tells me he’s really learned from the violent incident or even “gets” why people are still ambivalent toward him, despite his immense talent.
Each time the public allows Brown back into the fold it seems he gives us a reason to flinch.
After apologizing for violently beating Rihanna, instead of keeping a low profile, Brown seemed to fly off the handle each time he was asked about that night. Throwing a chair out of the window, getting into a Twitter spats, and disparaging gays marred Chris’ reformed image.
And yes, while it may be unfair to be constantly asked about “the incident,” as a public figure, Brown has to know that this will come up. He can either deal with it maturely, or continue to spaz out–each one either hurting or helping his public image.
But here’s the thing. Our feelings toward Chris Brown aren’t really about Breezy. They speak to a larger message we send our youngsters about relationships, domestic violence, and where we place the blame.
While his story could serve as a true story of redemption, sadly, it’s become yet another example of victim blaming, assuaging relationship violence, and embracing an not-so-apologetic abuser.
Writer Zerlina Maxwell summed up my thoughts perfectly: ”When Chris Brown is celebrated as some sort of survivor who pulled himself up from the ruins without the acknowledgment of that 2009 assault, a grave injustice is committed. Yet those who bring up the incident are accused of rehashing ‘old news’ and preventing a young man who deserves another chance from moving on. Brown’s smash records, film roles and successful tours (not to mention rumors that he continues to see ex-girlfriend Rihanna) make it quite clear: he’s not having a hard time moving on at all. Yet, if that terrible abuse could have at the very least been a lesson for young women and men, that lesson was largely lost to the cult of celebrity worship and our unhealthy tendency to accept and excuse domestic violence.”
What do you think?
alldawg, are you just not very smart?
I was using that as an example of why men should control their tempers. Men can really hurt women very easily. My situation was dramatically different than a couple having a argument and the man deciding he was sufficiently provoked so that it is now okay to punch a woman.
It’s not okay. Men are much stronger. Even if a women slaps you, you need to hold back your hand. As I said, it’s like a kid hitting a full-grown adult.
There, is that easier for you for you to understand now? I tried to use small words so you would understand.
Sometimes I think the men on here are just intentionally obtuse, they just don’t to know and don’t want to listen to anything that might be different than what they already believe.
jo-an
Well hold up, in your example you said the dude clocked you one reflexively after you hurt him, and that was just friendly sparring – right?
So add ‘beefin with crazy outta control b itch’ on top of that and you expect dude to turn into Ghandi
kiss teet
cuckoo
lmao
girls – you need to bring someone else in coz this one aint helpin the cause.
Socially Maladjusted –
It’s difficult for me to consider having some kind of a dialog with you. I’ve previously seen the results of your mental labors here on this blog, and it sure ain’t pretty. I’m going to excuse myself now; I think I have a dentist appointment I need to go to…undergoing a painful root canal procedure.
LOL!
Well ya can’t please all the people I guess.
But I think your decision retreat is probably a wise one, I probably would hurt you more than a root canal.
@Jo-Ann
“Men can really hurt women very easily.”
Im a woman weilding a bat, a crow bar, a knife, I have a gun, I have a brick, I have a sword, I have a frying pan, Im behind the wheel of my SUV. I can REALLY hurt men very easily.
People are always trying to say she hit him first. She said herself in her20/20 interview that she didn’t and he has NEVER said that she did. I believed she was arguing with him and he couldn’t take the pressure and raged out on her. He bit and choked her while boxing her as a man would fight in a ring or something. Some women are to blinded by these cute male celebrities to see them for who they really are. If Chris had beat your sister like that and didn’t serve jail time for assault and battery, would you be satisfied and keep saying we should get over it? People can’t get over many incidents of abuse, why should Chris be any different. Chris almost choked her to death. She had to gouge at his eyes for him to free her from the choke hold. She was slipping into unconsciousness.
his music is still whack
I’m not even a PR person, but I do that twitter and all other social networking sites can be your undoing as a celebrity. C-breezy, bro…you have a mouth on you…stay off twitter. Watch from the sidelines. We don’t need to know your opinion-tell it to your mama! I wanna see you ascend to higher heights than the ones on twitter!
Again, twitter should only be used by celebrities as a promotional vehicle. Use it to connect with your fans but not state your opinions.
Yes, Amen to this. I honestly think Twitter is one of the most perfectly useless inventions of the social networking era, good for almost nothing except fostering misunderstandings and cliches. There are clearly artists — and Breezy is clearly one of them — who basically need someone to tell them in no uncertain terms to stay away from Twitter, and probably from using the Internets under their own names altogether.
@ Jo-Anne.
Men should control their tempers? Just men? I have a few issues with this argument. Scenario: I go through my boyfriend’s phone. When I do this I discover that my boyfriend has slept with my best friend, my cousin and my sister. I’m furious so when he gets out the shower I decided to gather every dish and lamp in the house and throw them at him repeatedly. A busted lip here, a few broken teeth there. In the midst of my fury, my boyfriend decides to lose his temper as well and comes at me. But what do you know, I am all out of plates and lamps. There’s no reason for him to keep coming at me; but he does. By the time he’s done I have a black eye and a few fractures. He didn’t have to do that. He could have restrained me or called the cops. He was wrong. I do believe that, but I also believe that I was not a victim. I was a perpetrator just as wrong, if not more, as he is. I am helping to bring this feeling into my home. If my children see this I am just as accountable as he is. It seems accountability is nonexistent in today’s society. I think this is part of the problem as well. Granted, I don’t think most relationship abuse occurs in this form, but to discount it just because omen are weaker is wrong. Women are more resourceful than that. Our fists don’t work as well on men so we use other utilities. I guess my perspective on abuse is different because I saw a different form of it. I once saw my former aunt break a plate over my uncle’s head when she thought he was cheating, which he was. Got him by surprise when his back was turned and busted his head open. I fell into the wall and stayed that way for a few seconds. Just as she threw his phone at his bleeding head and raised another plate my uncle backhanded her and told me to call the police. When they got there my uncle was the only one who got arrested. (This could be due to the fact that we live in a small, predominately white town and his ex wife was in fact white. Nothing ever happened to her and my cousins were left living with a mom who they constantly saw slapping, kneeing, scratching and biting their step dad of the moment. My cousin grew up thinking that it was ok to hit, slap, and punch whatever guy she is dating when they were arguing. At least until her first semester in college. Her and her boyfriend were outside of a movie theater and she supposedly saw him checking out another girl. She slapped him a good one. Fortunately, it was in front of a cop. She got arrested and now has to go to court appointed anger management. I’m glad she’s getting the help she needs. I think that if we start acknowledging the seemingly smaller and more common incidents of violence. We could get somewhere with these discussions. When you see a woman slap a man, throw items, dangerous or not dangerous, or even pick up a bat or crow bar to batter a man’s car, there should be no “You go girl!” moments. THAT is domestic violence. The same goes for when a woman tries to walk away from a conversation and the man grabs her arm a little too hard to keep her there against her will. Or a man using his body to physically back you into a corner or against the wall to have you cower. These acts escalate. The next time Christmas comes around and you find yourself watching This Christmas(a movie ironically starring Chris Brown), and you get to the part where Regina King has finally had enough of Laz Alonzo’s character and decides to get revenge by pouring baby oil on the floor, which makes him fall, and whipping him with a belt, remember the message you’re sending to your kids as they see you shout “Get him girl!”. And these last statements are not directed specifically towards you Jo-Anne, just in general.
@QofN: “You guys are being extremely misandric (anti male.)”
Since I already explicitly referenced the taboo against male self-defense you go on to mention, and you failed to notice, I don’t think I’m going to lose sleep over this.
“A man in Texas received zero time in prison after shooting two unarmed buglars that entered his neighbors home.”
Yeah, you do realize Texas is fucking insane, right? I mean, a little piece of advice: if you ever wind up on trial for assault or excessive use of force, don’t make “well, there was this guy in Texas” part of your defense. It’s not likely to work.
As for this: “How so? . . . Nevermind that black children suffer most of their abuse at the hands of their largely single mothers and even more insidious is the abuse they suffer at the hands of mommy’s new hunk.”
Uhhhh, sounds like you’re working through some personal demons here, maybe? Good luck with that, just be careful how much of it you project onto “black women.”
bobdobolina
“sounds like you’re working through some personal demons here, maybe? Good luck with that, just be careful how much of it you project onto “black women.”
chuckles
nuff said – on that.
I like how you pointed out that it’s unwise to cherry pick the which trangressions you allow celebrities to rehabilitate, and how that kind of selective vengefulness could easily be applied to persecute and exclude anyone in the public eye whose deeds or mere presence in the celebrity pantheon, are irksome to those with some axe to grind.
Very perceptive
and canny.
With that said, for myself, I’d like to see the entire celebrity class swept away, just another class of of unworthy parasites who prey and look down on the working man and woman in my book.
.