60

Hypersensitive About Homosexuality

Friday Feb 10, 2012 – by

David Beckham, the world’s number one football (soccer) star, partnered with European fashion retail giant H&M to develop an exclusive line of body wear. The sexy ad campaign debuted a commercial during the Super Bowl to over 110 million viewers. Clad in only the most revealing boxer briefs, Beckham appeared super-toned, tatted, and confident. Amid a sea of traditionally sexist Super Bowl commercials, millions of women agreed it was (truly) one of the best ads of the night. Popular CNN correspondent Roland Martin did not share the sentiment, however.

Rowland Martin tweeted, “If a dude at your Super Bowl party is hyped about David Beckham’s H&M underwear ad, smack the ish out of him!”

Well, many were grossly offended, particularly The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) who immediately responded via Twitter and the next day called for Martin to be removed from CNN.

Some on “Black” Twitter quickly defended Martin for “giving his opinion” about “gay sh*t,” particularly several Black men. The ad included no man on man action, insinuation or public service announcement associating H&M with gay-anything. Beckham even flashes tattoos of his children and his wedding band. It was simply a (stunning) sexually provocative ad that succeeded in gaining the attention of millions, a marketing plan seen over and again as in Victoria’s Secret commercials. Why the hypersensitivity Black men?

Martin’s tweet contained a violent undertone though he attempted to spin as comedic or a dig at soccer players. Poor judgment from a public figure on Twitter happens more often than not, but Martin’s intolerant reaction also speaks to a deeper issue. Black men in general struggle with understanding homosexuality, as it remains a weirdly taboo issue in our greater community. Weird in that few honest discussions are held in public platforms to dissolve perceived stigmas, yet reference to any homoerotic activity or behaviors are frequently met with knee-jerk homophobic reaction. Why the hypersensitivity Black men?

Calm down for 30 seconds (length of the ad) and consider that within the large viewing and even NFL player statistics, homosexuals exist in the numbers. American football, arguably one of the most homoerotic sports in the world, remains the most watched. Yet a boxer brief sighting sparks irritation? Some men may have been attracted to Beckham’s image, but ultimately what difference does it make? H&M simply aimed to take advantage of the largest viewing audience in recent Super Bowl history. So the question remains, why the hypersensitivity Black men?

Martin has since apologized for his tweets, but GLAAD is still calling for CNN to remove him from the network (he has since been suspended). Based on the reckless commentary and widespread reaction, a better resolution may be for Martin to lead a public discussion about diversity, acceptance, or homosexual stereotypes promoted by media images and influence. In the least he should have to take a class on social media etiquette, as few will support “machismo” tweets, no filter.

60 Comments – Add Yours

  1. avatar Yep... I'm the Misses :-D says:

    What happened to freedom of speech?? GLAAD is trying take away ppl’s constitutional rights. I understand if someone is maliciously making a statement to insight violence, but it was a slip up that he has since apologized for, why does he have to lose his job for that?? GLAAD is doing too much with trying to get him kicked off the air.

    • avatar Melu says:

      Co-sign! GLAAD is a bully organization.

    • avatar Cantarah says:

      You need to read the First Amendment.

      There is no guarantee you can say whatever you want without fear of consequences. Roland Martin can say what he wants, GLAAD is welcome to criticize him for it, and his bosses are free to suspend him. That’s the way it works.

      Don Imus had the First Amendment right to call those women nappy headed ho’s. Civil rights groups had the right to call for boycotts and his firing. Dr. Laura had the right to say “nigg**, nigg**, nigg**” to that black woman on air. She indulged her First Amendment right and did so. And everybody else exercised their own rights and complained until she was forced off the air.

      See how this works?

  2. avatar Afia says:

    Why do we need to joke about gayness? What is the point? It’s not just a joke when it fuels a climate that is already oppressive and hateful. It’s easy to attack and demean something that is caricaturized.

    It’s not just a joke. There’s a history behind it. Just like how there’s a history behind the words nigger, coon, etc. Black people were the butt of jokes and continue to be. Is it any wonder that violence has plagued the Black community in America for centuries?

    Let’s be smart folks.

    • avatar BlacknAmazed says:

      @Afia… No comparison…..So please cut the crap….He didn’t even say anyting about GAY! He said if a guy is excited about the underwear ad. Where is the word GAY or any other messed up word that people would use against gay people.

      The Gay community seem to think that they have some right to dare ” the black community” to ever speak on them…..I wonder why that is?. Roland is in one of those positions like Tracy Morgan…these people can come in and take his income.

      But, in life….you re not changin nothing….straight men are still gonna say what their gonna say. By attacking a whole community based on foolishness is not making anyone rethink their views….as long as you idiots know that.

      And don’t ever compare….two men or two women wanting a marriage license to hunderds of years of salvery…And miss me with the in the past stuff….lets come into 2012 with the mass promotion of genociding our exsistence in this country. and telling us we shouldn’t care…. as if our exsistence shouldn’t mean anything. I wonder why that is? Black people are STILL dealing with our ancestors being brought here as property and working to be treated failrly and as humans in 2012! SO I SAY TO ANYONE TALKIN THAT SH$T TO GO TO HELL!

    • avatar Cantarah says:

      “The Gay community seem to think that they have some right to dare ” the black community” to ever speak on them…..I wonder why that is?. Roland is in one of those positions like Tracy Morgan…these people can come in and take his income.”

      The Black community seem to think that they have some right to dare ” the white community” to ever speak on them…..I wonder why that is?. Dr.Laura is in one of those positions like Don Imus…these people can come in and take his income.

    • avatar AA says:

      People really don’t get what freedom of speech is. Just like you can’t go into work and curse out your boss or embarrass them in front of clients, Martin can’t embarrass his company without consequences. Freedom of speech has nothing to do with it.
      As far as those of you who believe this had nothing to do with homophobia… you’re obviously missing the implications here. Though I know I’m talking to a brick wall.
      The gay community has historically been subject to much violence. They were sent to death camps right along with Jews during Nazi reign.
      The things we say cultivate a certain atmosphere. If you create an atmosphere where its okay to hate on a certain group, it can also contribute to an atmosphere where violence is perpetrated against that group.

  3. avatar Ash says:

    People seem to misunderstand what Freedom of Speech actually means- you won’t go to jail for speaking your mind, but it doesn’t protect you if your employer decides to throw you the pink slip. Gay people constitute a enough of CNN’s audience that they will certainly take what GLAAD has to say seriously. RM should have taken a moment to think before tweeting.

  4. avatar alldawg says:

    Ladies…

    There is going to come a day, when you go out for a night on the town, and some man is going to have your dress on…

    you cant say anything negative, without being called homophoic….

  5. avatar CaramelBeauty says:

    Stay off of Twitter!!!!!!!

    • avatar cupcakes and shiraz says:

      I would have to agree with you. If I was a famous person I would not have a facebook or twitter b/c you’ll basically have a lynch mob hanging over every word you type.

  6. avatar Rynda says:

    Dayum!! I thought freedom of speech existed in the country. Yeah, Roland said something stupid. He has been suspended. He apologised. What more do people want?!?
    Get over it!! I already know somebody’s gonna say something snippy back to me. Go ahead. Get it out your system.

    WHAT EVER!

  7. avatar African Mami says:

    That tweet did not state any homophobic stance. There are certainly intonations, but not explicitly so…..there’s a lot that can be assumed from it. But, GLAAD is pushing it! Fired….eh, no. Not with them, on this one.

  8. avatar Rocco says:

    Good article. I am sympathetic to people who get annoyed by overly-politically correct behavior, but I genuinely thought that Martin’s tweets crossed the line for a media figure. The unacceptable part of it was the callous violence that his messages conveyed. There were 2 that contains exhortations of violence and one about how real brothas won’t buy the underwear. I don’t mind the remark about the real brothas but the violence did upset me. I think it’s one thing to be dismissive, disdainful, belittling, etc. of a person or a group but encouraging violence is not OK and should cross the line for the media. I didn’t know Martin well but I read his articles from time to time and those tweets made him come across as mean, which isn’t a good look for a media figure. Free speech is one thing but of course things you say in such a wide venue are going to impact your career.

Leave a Comment

  • We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
  • Please keep comments related to topic.
  • Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.

Daily Blog - News.Gossip.Info