Every now and then, someone tries to make a case for objective beauty–the notion that there is a quasi-scientific way to judge whether a person is attractive or not. They will bang on about facial symmetry and the golden mean . Or they will note early man’s sexual predilections, trumpeting “natural” attraction to youth and child-bearing hips. They (poorly) analyze survey data. In the end, all this so-called objectivity simply serves to uphold white, Western standards of beauty. After witnessing the sturm und drang following a host of allegedly objective pronouncements about beauty, I’m convinced they’re all bunk. Beauty, as we all learned as children, is in the eye of the beholder. It is subjective–always and forever.

The latest minor storm over beauty standards came this week when several news outlets took a contest sponsored by a British chat show seriously. The ITV program , “Lorraine,” pronounced 18-year-old Florence Colgate (above) a perfect, natural beauty and “Britain’s most beautiful face.” American news outlets, including ABC’s “Good Morning America” and the Gawker network online jumped on the story of the lovely Ms. Colgate, touting her “perfect” dimensions. It was no surprise to many that a young, white, blonde and blue-eyed woman would be held up as the face of beauty. This is the (racially-biased) standard, after all, that Western women of all races are judged against. Indeed, one Carmen Lefèvre, from the University of St Andrews perception laboratory in the School of Psychology, gave the game away when she was quoted in The Daily Mail. She said, “Florence has all the classic signs of beauty. She has large eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion.” (Bold mine.)

And that’s the thing. Facial symmetry and other measurable factors may influence what we find attractive, but I’d wager that nurture (societal and personal bias) has more to do what we like than nature. Consider if Florence Colgate’s face possessed the same proportions, yet was a rich, cocoa brown, rather than pale white. What if she wore a teenie weenie afro rather than long, loose blonde hair? What if her face was fatter? Will people still find this young woman beautiful 40 years from now, when her face has wrinkled and perhaps her hair has grayed? Chances are, any of these factors would change our perceptions of her attractiveness. We are a culture that, for now, worships whiteness, thinness and youth–especially for women. Women of color, fat women and older women are generally left out of the beauty paradigm.

But beauty standards change (which should be a big sign that they are subjective). Compare the body types revered during the mid-20th century to the ones championed today. Just last year, Allure magazine declared the “All-American Beauty” dead. When asked to rate a bunch of non-celebrity models, the magazine’s readers chose a Latina woman and a South Asian man as ideals. This week, Beyonce became the second black woman to be named People magazine’s “most beautiful.” Who knows what the future of beauty holds. It’s a safe bet what we find beautiful 20 years from now will be based, in great part, on a host of things more abstract than measured space between brow and hairline.

This discussion should not be a referendum on whether Florence Colgate is attractive or not. Weigh in on beauty standards and whether you think they are objective or subjective.

17
SHARES
  • Yb

    Beauty standards are promoted and influenced by society (this white supremacist society). In this media obsessed day and age I find it nearly impossible to find someone with a genuine preference and beauty standard that has not been influenced by the media, peers, or society.

    Beauty is subjective and influenential.

    0
    • Dreaming

      My preferences aren’t influenced by the media, peers, or society.

      I think red heads are attractive.

      I hate broad shoulders on men.

      I don’t care so much how tall a man is, as long as he isn’t shorter than me (I’m 5’5).

      0
    • Yb

      I find red hair to be beautiful as well.

      +1

      0
    • HopeChest

      I love fiery-head people too! My first crush was a redhead!

      Until a few years ago, I had no idea that there was hate for ‘gingers’ in some places, like in Europe.

      Apparently, redheads are discriminated against. Who knew?

      0
    • I got sense!

      @ YB

      Beauty standards have existed long before there was a white dominated society and long before people were classifying themselves as black, white, asian, indian, etc.

      0
    • Yb

      @i got

      I was speaking of the beauty standards of today.

      0
    • I got sense!

      @Yb

      “I was speaking of the beauty standards of today.”

      Not all beauty standards started “today”. Beauty standards, must like fashion is cyclical.

      0
  • Dreaming

    Yes, beauty is definitely subjective. However, there are some people who have what I refer to as ‘universal beauty’ where they overall have a look that many people would agree is beautiful.

    The woman in the photo above isn’t unattractive, but she isn’t attractive, to me.

    0
    • http://www.jessicasimien.com Jessica

      I agree with your statement. I think certain people have a universal beauty but the young lady above just doesn’t (in my opinion) have perfect dimensions or should be held as a standard of beauty. She looks kinda like your average nice looking woman, no big deal.

      0
    • binks

      Why do I even need to comment when you pretty much summarize what I wanted to say…lol I agree, there are some people who would be held as attractive to general populations of people but to me she is sort of “run of the mill pretty” because I find beauty in “odd” features

      0
    • Dreaming

      Hey sis!

      0
    • binks

      Right back at ya sis! See your comments save me from being wordy…lol

      0
    • I got sense!

      @ Dreaming

      Yes, beauty is definitely subjective. However, there are some people who have what I refer to as ‘universal beauty’ where they overall have a look that many people would agree is beautiful.”

      Universal beauty (while coined something else) is exactly what the science says. It’s not a white women are always pretty type of thing. It’s about facial symmetry and how certain ratios create an overall look that many people would agree is beautiful. That’s not to say that those who do not have the perfect ratio can’t be and aren’t beautiful, it’s just saying that those who do have it or more likely to be seen as beautiful.

      0
    • df

      I agree…universal beauty pretty much equals an individualized, unique version of facial symettry (meaning combo of any sort of features that are just balanced, it doesn’t equal thin nose, big eyes..etc). Simple as that. Beyond that honestly, it’s just vain and a waste of time to nitpick on looks (i’m not talking about fashion or makeup or anything like that though).

      0
  • jamesfrmphilly

    it is an objective reality that black women, in fact black people, are most beautiful.

    0
    • tisme

      Thanks James.I personally think most people of all races look regular.I’ve never seen many shockingly beautiful people.Just a bunch of people that look like….well,people.
      There are a few people that just look amazing to me.I look at them and I think wow there really is a God but that has rarely happened.

      0
    • CHE

      Hi Jamesfrmphilly

      I kind of agree. I grew up without television and around mostly Black people….and the people touted on television as so beautiful(usually white women- do nothing for me). My eye always looks for Blackness of some kind-and I cant even tell you what that means- but my eyes and brain know what I am talking about. Its not that I cannot find other groups attractive but my eyes look for Blackness….Black Africans, Black Americans, Caribbeans and some Hispanics. I really cannot explain it.

      0
  • http://www.GaptoothDiva.com I’esha GaptoothDiva

    I totally agree. I, of course, find beauty in most flaws and odd features as well. I find what most people refer to as “universal” beauty to be plain nowadays. It’s not unattractive, its just boring to assume that certain features on people automatically make them beautiful. It’s freckles, super dark skin, large eyes and noses, accidental flaws, and God-given gaps that interest me. That’s beauty in my eyes.

    0
  • Tonton Michel

    It has always been subjective the problem is when people keep thinking it is objective and wonder why they do not fit in. It is this never ending journey for the Holy Grail of validation from a certain group of people that is problematic and unhealthy for the mind. I do not see the purpose in getting worked up about what other people find attractive. The pic above is their standard of beauty, cant be mad at them for choosing what they like.

    0
    • TheBestAnonEver, Part 2

      I agree with you completely. Why is this an issue for us? This was a contest for them, why have “we” made it personal? SMH.

      0
    • Tonton Michel

      Because “we” are in love with them……..

      0
    • Dreaming

      She’s being championed as “Britain’s most beautiful”. Surely, Britain isn’t made up of only White people, right?

      0
    • Tonton Michel

      Over 80% of British people are white so this would be a logical choice for them. And of course if you have a healthy image of your self void of low self esteem than of course when the choice of beauty comes up you would look to someone who the most like you or what you feel is the best representation of you. I’m not mad at them I applaud them, it is a sign of a confident and healthy mind.

      0
Read previous post:
Close