Ghetto Matters: “That’s So Ghetto”

by Zettler Clay

51934346TB003_End_Near_For_

Published on 4/20/2009

It’s becoming as American as the iPod: Adult intellectual stud achieves prominence after being born in Ghettoville, U.S.A., knocking down the myriad obstacles in his/her path to reach a level of success that nobody thought possible. Decrepit inner-city schools couldn’t hope him back. Lack of financial resources couldn’t stop her from fulfilling her dreams. Even having an early child was not enough. She may have been in the ghetto, but the ghetto was not in she, as the saying goes.

What exactly is the ghetto?

For the unenlightened – which constitutes, say, anybody who uses this term to connote the urban black impoverished – the term “ghetto” originated as a reference to secluded Jewish quarters in Italy. These quarters weren’t always unkempt either; in some cases, they were well-resourced. Over the years, it has morphed into something of a synonym for blight in chocolate communities. Rampant poverty, drugs and single-mothers. No examples of scholarly or financial excellence. A place where frequent studying and reading makes you an abnormality, but also a place where children can count on the continued encouragement of many adults, even the miscreants. Children who grow up in these environments to receive college degrees should be given a standing O every time they’re seen in the streets. Really.

That’s so ghetto.

It’s an idiom that signals a crude remark or uncouth manners or just general unruly behavior. It is a grossly inaccurate statement, the brother of “hot ghetto mess” and the second cousin of “Indian giver”. It is representative of our lowest rung, the socially invisible and the politically marginalized. It is an incubator where ugly behavior and nihilism lives, a place to be shunned at all costs by higher society. It is what employers see when they look at an applicant’s address, and decide whether to call him or her back based on just that. It is naming your child Tanisha, Shanquita, Lovita, or Amare. It is yelling and cackling in the movie theater. It is long press-on finger nails, loud gum popping, skimpy outfits, tattoos, gold teeth and myriad children running around. It is {fill in the blank with favorite example]. “It” is our ghetto.

Classifying a group of people as this one word is irresponsible at best and hurtful at worse. It goes without saying – and of course I am now saying this – that not everyone from impoverished neighborhoods act uncouth or give their children concocted names. Considering that many of the nation’s best tantalizers, i.e. the rich and famous among us, profess their roots in meager beginnings, there’s a certain hypocritical element that comes with devaluing the “least” among us. The world lauds the sounds and performances and words of Tupac Shakur, Sean Carter, Oprah Winfrey, Dr. Michael Eric Dyson, Keyshia Cole, Jamie Foxx, Hilary Swank, Lupe Fiasco, Ella Fitzgerald, to name a few, but down their launching pads. These are just a few of the many talents whose provenance was in Obscure America. Rags-to-riches stories of this kind are sold to titillate our fantasies and minds and hearts; it’s even great fodder for journalists, 60 Minute specials and movies.

But the others are ignored. The American blacks that aren’t fortunate enough to “make it out” remain on the fringes, to be dismissed as people who are bereft of the character necessary to pull themselves up and do better.

Where is this ghetto?

Is it public housing? Is it an area of dilapidated homes? Centralized poverty? Is it even brick-and-mortar? The notion of the “ghettocracy” as a purely geographic entity is, to put it bluntly, limited. Institutions, i.e. households and communities, are not soulless; they’re filled with people and are nothing without them. As long as a person retains the comportment congruent to a “ghetto” person, then ghettocracy will live, whether they’re in a mansion or a shanty. There are more white Americans living in poverty than Black Americans, yet this fact seems to elude many publicized case studies. White people can exhibit habits of the ghetto, but never in my life have I heard a white person being called ghetto. This double standard is a new age attack of the nobility vs. the serf, but one that takes on a racial component as well.

It isn’t just white people using the “ghetto” term liberally. The demeaning of American blacks in public housing or anywhere else that are deprived of resources is mostly perpetuated inside the race. White supremacy can and does exist inside black skin, even in the most subtlest of ways.

Living in the ghetto should never be a desirable state of life. Situations of families who have been in the throes of public housing for generations, whether through sloth or unfortunate circumstances, is less deserving of scorn and more deserving of compassion. People who have never set foot in projects routinely enjoy the fruits of former project dwellers (hip-hop artists for example) but remain hyper critical at the behavior, level of crime, poverty and drug uses going on there. Those are real issues to be sure and there is nothing glamorous about the ill effects of these communities. But it is where our disapproval lies that is most telling: Is the ghetto viewed as an enemy to mercilessly avoid or an entity that is full of soulful people that are deserving of our compassion, prayers, and in many respects, our admiration? Before you call someone’s actions ghetto in condescension, remember the connotations. Bad behavior is bad behavior. Rudeness is rudeness. It has nothing to do with salary, as there are rich people who weekly make the news because of “ghetto” behavior. But a rich man’s actions ain’t ghetto…right?

The word “ghetto” is not synonymous with behavior; it is an ecological condition of dystopian proportions on one hand, and a community of fun and loving and dignified people on the other. Children growing up under these environs need every help they can get to escape the grips, not polarizing terms from elitists that do nothing to affirm their worth.

So if you want to use “ghetto” to classify a group of people’s behavior while elevating yourself in the process, well, maybe you should consider climbing off your high horse before you get hurt.

  • The Comment

    This must be from an East Coast difinition. And I’m not sure if people on the East Coast have section 8 but in Cali you can live in a brand new spanking home vs projects…cause we really dont have projects. You go to San Francisco and you’d think you were in a regular neighborhood not knowing it was the hood.

    So if most of you are comparing ghettos by the East coast standard I can see why I am the lone dissenter when it comes to poverty and culture. I see these people wearing their hood status as a badge of honor although they have been relocated to greener pastures with no obstacles other than themselves. And guess what…they are still single mothers, they still won’t go to school. They have brought the gangs out to the suburbs. They still walk around with pajamas and scrafs in the middle of the godd*amn day. They have brought the ghetto with them.

    Which is why I have no mercy on the disccusion of poverty. 1st of all…if you are in poverty…you don’t have cable, food stamps, vouchers for day care…poverty means being homeless. People in the ghetto are not homeless.

    But the article is well written but does not apply to California difinition of a ghetto.

  • Bangel

    My dear you are being WAY too judgemental. The thing you don’t understand is poverty is not only a condition but it is a mentally, and they are only duplicating what they see. This is why education is so important because unless you LEARN better, you can’t DO better. All they have ever seen is deprivation, and so they repeat that cycle. They have to be exposed to a better way of life, because trust their “regular” neighbor surely won’t stop by to explain the rules to them.

  • Nell

    Bangel, you can’t educate people who don’t value education and don’t want it.

  • Nell

    Bangel, you can’t educate people who don’t value it and don’t want it. Therein lies the problem. If someone has a child, it’s primarily their responsibility to care for them, and if the parent is living in poverty, improve their child’s opportunities and instill a respect for education. No matter how many well-meaning outsiders try to help that child, the child will first & foremost follow their parent’s behavior and guidance. Until the parents step up, no one else can educate children out of that environment.

Latest Stories

Watch Chanel Carroll Parody Beyonce’s ‘Partition’ in ‘Tuition’ Song

by

Hero Alert: Darnell Taylor Saves Family After Mother Purposely Drives Into River

by

Major Retailers Sell Out of ‘Mimi Shower Rods’

by

Black Journalist Wins 2014 Pulitzer Prize

by
Read previous post:
The Pleasure Principle
Our Girls Aren’t Seeing Themselves on Their Bookshelves
Close