It was hard not to be disturbed by the case of Rhonda Lee, a meteorologist who was reportedly fired by ABC affiliate KTBS in Shreveport, La. for defending her hairstyle.

Lee wrote a professional and thoughtful response to a viewer’s tactless critique of her hair, one that she believes was the catalyst for her firing. Lee said she was not made aware of the social media policy prohibiting her response. She claimed the policy was communicated to employers in a meeting she did not attend and was never documented.

Lee’s story was picked up by countless news outlets and she appeared on CNN and took calls from MSNBC and the “Tom Joyner Morning Show.”

Due to the publicity, KTBS issued an explanation for Lee’s firing, saying it was based on policy rather than her hairstyle. Their statement clearly contradicts Lee’s account of events, making this a case of their word against hers:

“On November 28, 2012, KTBS dismissed two employees for repeated violation of the station’s written procedure. We can confirm that Rhonda Lee was one of the employees. Another employee was a white male reporter who was an eight year veteran of the station. The policy they violated provided a specific procedure for responding to viewer comments on the official KTBS Facebook page. Included is an email that was sent to all news department employees informing them of this procedure. This procedure is based on advice from national experts and commonly used by national broadcast and cable networks and local television stations across the country.

“Unfortunately, television personalities have long been subject to harsh criticism and negative viewer comments about their appearance and performance. If harsh viewer comments are posted on the station’s official website, there is a specific procedure to follow.

“Ms. Rhonda Lee was let go for repeatedly violating that procedure and after being warned multiple times of the consequences if her behavior continued. Rhonda Lee was not dismissed for her appearance or defending her appearance. She was fired for continuing to violate company procedure.”

What do you think of KTBS’ statement defending Rhonda Lee’s firing? Do you still believe there was foul play?

14 Comments

  1. I don’t believe this situation is about race or her hairstyle. She’s not the owner of the tv station’s FB page and should not have responded there without permission. Anytime a company is addressed publicly there is a protocol that has to be followed. Because she’s an employee of the tv station, responding on the tv station’s FB page is considered a response on behalf of the tv station. She didn’t have permission to do so. While I agree with what she said in her responses, she should have received permission from the tv station before responding on their FB page or found another way to address it.

    0
    • Sammy

      Makes sense though i wish she wouldn’t have been fired. She doesn’t need to defend what God gave her – just let the beauty shine!

      0
  2. in what U.S. do you live little- mind girl?

    0
  3. Tacoma23

    This article was intentionally misleading. The other articles mention a second time when she responded to facebook posts after being warned not to. It also doesn’t mention that this isn’t the first time she claims she claimed racism after being fired. Here is a link: http://thegrio.com/2012/12/12/reporter-fired-after-responding-to-racially-charged-facebook-comments-about-her-hair/#50188277

    0
Comments are moderated, please be respectful. View our policy.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

More in race, racism
Close