NY Giants Football Player Robbed By Groupie Catwoman

In today’s “Groupies Do The Darndest Things” news, it seems as though one managed to get off with $500,000 in jewelry from one unsuspecting, and quite possibly stupid, football player.

On March 24, Rogers was living it up at LIV nightclub in Miami. He apparently met a woman at the club, brought her back to his hotel room, knocked some boots and fell asleep. What he didn’t know was that he picked up the Cat Woman.

When he woke up the next morning, she was gone, and so was his precious jewels. Rogers is now out of: diamond earrings worth $100,000; two wristwatches worth a combined $160,000; a gold necklace with gold pendant worth $50,000; gold bracelets worth $60,000; and a diamond Cuban necklace with a gold pendant worth $70,000. Sure, he may have placed his stash of  “what may lead him to be the subject in the next 30 for 30 episode” in a safe, but I wonder if he bothered to lock it?

In the words of Fred Sanford, “You big dummy!”

Rogers did report the robbery to the police and I’m sure they had a good laugh in their squad car, as well did plenty of people on Twitter.

NY Giants Football Player Robbed By Groupie Catwoman

  • http://www.notacookie.com Laneé

    Okay I was with you until the last sentence. You’re right, the female was wrong to rob him and yes he should’ve used better judgement. He didn’t deserve to get robbed just because he did something stupid. But your rape comment was uncalled for.

  • jcross

    “He didn’t deserve to get robbed just BECAUSE HE DID SOMETHING STUPID”. Yes indeed, it was stupid. Drinking irresponsibly is just as stupid. It’s not automatically ‘supporting rape’ just because one believes that ALL people, male and female, should be aware of their surroundings in certain situations. Yes, I 100% agree that the root of the problem (rape) is the mentally and subsequent actions of the men, but IN THE MEANTIME, it’s not wrong to use a little wisdom since the problem still exists (like in previous articles, women mentioned having friends with you when you know you will be drinking,etc.). If there’s a sign that says “STAND BACK, LIVE WIRE INSIDE” and you go over and touch it anyway and get electrocuted to death because you have the freedom to do what you want (stupid ideas included), then that’s unfortunate. Of course I didn’t want you to die; doesn’t mean that your actions were not stupid. Extreme example, but we could use anything: putting your hands in a beehive, swimming in a shark-infested ocean while your bleeding… To be clear, I’m only alluding to cases where the same thing happens over and over and over under a certain circumstance and people keep acting shocked about the outcome.

  • Mademoiselle

    @jcross Men are not live wire, nor sharks, nor bees. They’re human beings with the ability and the obligation to respect a woman’s safety regardless of what stupid thing she’s doing or how drunk she is. Unless you’re proposing that all men walk around with “WARNING: WILL RAPE WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY” signs, then you need to take that victim blaming garbage somewhere else. The women that robbed this man were wrong and should face the full extent of the law. Rapists are wrong and should face the full extent of the law. Both, regardless of who the victim is or what the victim did. This article isn’t even about rape, but since you seem to need the knowledge: all men [and women] are required by law to refrain from having sex [or simulating sex with foreign objects] with anyone who is too drunk, too impaired, or too young to legally consent to it. Absence of someone’s clothing or sobriety do not exempt anyone from that law. That’s the beginning and end of any justification you think applies to what happens to rape victims.