The GrioFrom The Grio — Over the last decade, AIDS in the United States has become increasingly concentrated in the South, which accounts for nearly half of all new AIDS cases.

Yet, despite the emergence of AIDS as one of the region’s most serious health problems, Southern states too often fail to use the weapons that are available to prevent new HIV infections. This is especially true when it comes to support for harm reduction programs that prevent new cases of drug-related HIV transmission.

In my own state of Florida, one of the worst hit by AIDS, not a single publicly funded syringe exchange program – one that exchanges used needles for new ones to injection drug users — currently operates.

As a minister, I am acutely aware of the painful toll that drug abuse takes on our families and communities. But in addressing the harms of drug abuse, we need to adopt approaches that are sound, effective and compassionate. Too often, our approaches in the South don’t meet this test.

The numbers say it works

Dozens of studies have confirmed that syringe exchange programs represent the most effective tool available to prevent drug-related HIV transmission. In countries that have aggressively supported syringe exchange, HIV transmission through drug use has been virtually eliminated. They also serve as a vital bridge to services such as drug treatment, housing, employment and overdose prevention.

However, in a misguided effort to display toughness on drugs, Congress voted in 2011 to prohibit federal funding from being used to support this highly effective approach. With the federal government representing the lion’s share of funding for HIV prevention services, the termination of its support for syringe exchange has caused many local programs to cut staff, reduce services and consider going out of business.

It is important to understand during these times of fiscal restraint that lifting the ban on federal funding for syringe services programs will not cost any additional money. It simply allows localities to spend their federal dollars on syringe exchange services if they choose to do so. We know that every dollar spent on syringe exchange saves $3 to $7 in HIV treatment costs alone. In other words, lifting the ban would save lives and dollars without costing a dime.

The hurdles

In response to the loss of federal funding, many states and localities have stepped into the breach, providing essential funding to keep these life-saving programs from going under. That hasn’t been the case throughout the South, a region with the largest percentage of injection drug users diagnosed with AIDS in the country in 2011.

We have seen the result of this inaction by the presence of gross health disparities – and the statistics are heartbreaking. Nationwide, African-Americans are eleven times and Latinos are five times more likely to become infected with HIV from injection drug use than Caucasians. At the end of 2010, more than half of adult and teenage injection drug users living in the United States with HIV were African-American.  As the Chairman of the National Black Leadership Commission on AIDS Inc., and the resident of a state with a sizeable Latino community, I have personally witnessed these disproportionate and devastating results.

(Continue Reading @ The Grio…)

Tags: , , ,
Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter
  • Kay

    Actually an old professor of mine works in a needle exchange program and gave me some information on harm reduction. I started doing research on my own and reached out to a few organizations as well. Apparently, it actually helps more than it hurts, as addiction is a process that involves multiple drug users, often at once. Drug addicts stick themselves more than once to get a vein, then share that same needle with others. The blood is then transferred over and over again, with viruses hitting multiple people at once. Often, drug users are suffering from a host of other maladies that can put them at greater risk of contracting HIV.

    They get infections from injecting with dirty needles, and end up with cysts, skin disorders and the like. So I think instead of trying to prevent the user from doing drugs (which hasn’t worked, as evidenced by the failed war on drugs) but to reduce the incidence of HIV from traveling from person to person. After all the virus doesn’t just stay in the drug dens. Many addicts are functioning and then infect many others outside of these communities.