The Grio

With the latest announcement of plans by the Caribbean Community Reparations Commission, an association of eight Caribbean governments, to move forward in seeking reparations from Britain, France, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway and Sweden for slavery and genocide, the reparations discussion has been reignited, with many wondering if little or any success will come from the effort.

After all, few African-descended initiatives of this nature have succeeded. To ensure a better outcome, Caricom, as the group is known, has hired the British law firm Leigh Day which got hundreds of Kenyans tortured by the British colonial government in the 1950s and 1960s a reported settlement of £4.5 million.

While Leigh Day has not won any settlements for reparations of this nature, it is not unprecedented action. In 1989, President H.W. Bush signed legislation making way for the United States to pay out more than one billion dollars to over 110,000 Japanese it placed in “War Relocation Camps” during World War II following Pearl Harbor. Through the Luxembourg Agreement of 1952, Germany has paid out over $70 billion for the Holocaust.

These settlements are indeed possible, but efforts by African descendants to get reparations have fallen short. Various calls for French restitution to Haiti for the monies it was forced to pay after successfully defeating the French in what is arguably the only successful slave rising on this side of the world has resulted in no such actions.

From 1825 to 1946, Haiti paid what is estimated to be $21 billion in today’s monetary value despite winning the war. But because France had more political currency, they could determine the terms even though they lost. Given Haiti’s ongoing challenges since its official independence in 1804, that sum could surely have gone towards developing its nation and assisting its own population instead of greening French coffers. This travesty is certainly one that Caricom has prioritized.

But, with all the undisputed information about the injustices committed against those of African descent especially in the Caribbean whose current population is largely the result of the slave trade, why haven’t the European powers involved paid up? Britain alone brought over 3.1 million Africans between 1662 and 1807, when it ended its participation in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Even those who point to the role some Africans played in the kidnapping of other Africans who were enslaved throughout various parts of the world are forced to acknowledge that those Africans did not benefit as substantially as European nations like Portugal and Spain who used slave labor to establish long-lingering footprints in what was then the New World to them.

Most Caribbean and African nations have been under their own rule for just half a century and are only recently celebrating such milestones in the aughts. In fact, African descendants dominate the Caribbean now because of the slave trade. With well less than a hundred years of self-government, how is it possible for previous colonial powers not to compensate these nations?

Yes some enjoy friendly relationships with their former colonial governments and informally receive financial support, but does that filter to the average person in these nations? Does it help these nations compete on a larger scale?

In the U.S. talks of reparations are rarely taken seriously despite longstanding efforts to attain them. Former slave Callie House was a leader in the National Ex-Slave Mutual Relief, Bounty and Pension Association, launched in the 1890s, that specifically targeted $68 million collected in taxes on Confederate cotton during the Civil War to compensate ex-slaves. But even with this targeted focus, House found herself incarcerated on trumped up charges of fraud.

As Caricom moves forward with its specific mission, it has to address why the general consensus is resistance to the very idea that those of African descent should be compensated in the first place. When we know that slaves were forced to perform back-breaking labor for free, as well as frequently beaten, tortured and raped, why are reparations an issue? When we know that Africa was drained of its people and that many didn’t even survive the Middle Passage, why are talks about reparations treated as folly? In fact, someone thought it funny to falsely report that France had agreed to pay reparations to Haiti.

(Continue Reading @ The Grio…)

Tags: , ,
Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter
  • TheHistoricalAgathist

    I agree with the above comments that it is highly unlikely that blacks in the US or anywhere else will ever receive reparations. However, in a just world, reparations would have already been paid to try to ameliorate this injustice. And I’m not just referring to slavery but to systemic racism in government programs that prevented blacks from owning homes or participating in farm subsidy programs, etc. These roadblocks have prevented blacks from accumulating wealth at a rate equal to whites, and will continue to put us at a significant economic and social disadvantage.

    The amount of money that would be required to repair this disparity would be astronomical, and for that reason alone, it will never happen. Even if an effort were made to pour money into black communities, I would rather that money go into improving schools/housing/infrastructure, creating meaningful jobs in impoverished communities, and starting mentorship/leadership programs that will prepare black children for successful careers in high-paying industries.

  • K

    i dont think it will ever happen at least in America. We cant even find out ancestors for ancestral/geological purposes.. How are we going to find out whose ancestors exactly were in slavery? Cant just assume b/c some were free people of color (& some of those “Our Kind of People” types will not hesitate to let you know their ancestor was never enslaved) unless were going back to 1500’s & the first african to arrive making the search even more difficult.

    Plus who gets how much money? it was 400 years of slavery, you know how many descendants could be from one slave at this point? Two slaves? since slave mostly procreated w/one another. so will it go by that slaves descendants split a certain amount (assuming its going by who was enslaved and their descendants now) or will every descendant get there own amount. (ex. 100 descendants splitting 100,000 since they all came from that one slave or each descendent getting 100,000). If you are descended from 2 slaves as opposed to 1 slave 1 master do you get double?

    Plus I have to agree with above i shudder literally shudder to think what some of our people would do with that money. It would be 10x worse than that Dave Chapelle skit.

    If the day ever comes for reparations to happen in America I say put all the money in a trust and everyone who can prove they had a descendent born pre emancipation (which is usually about as far back as we can go before you hit the “slave wall”) can apply for that money for education once they hit college age. They know once they hit college all college expenses will be paid for out this reparation fund.

  • the day will come when they will be paid………

  • Dee

    It’s interesting that this should be happening in the year 2013…which marks the 175th anniversary of the August 1838 emancipation of the enslaved in British colonies in the West Indies.