Thursday afternoon Florida prosecutors announced that Jameis Winston, quarterback for Florida State University Seminoles, will not be arrested in an investigation into rape allegations last year.

Prosecutors say key factors in their decision includes the accuser’s recollection of events during the December 2012 incident. The accuser alleged Winston raped her after she had been drinking with friends at a bar, according to Willie Meggs, the state attorney.

“We have a duty as prosecutors to only file … charges if we have a reasonable likelihood of a conviction,” he said. “We did not feel we could meet that burden.”

Meggs also stated that investigators did not have even probable cause to arrest Winston, which requires a low standard of proof.

Defense attorney Tim Jansen described Winston’s reaction in a press conference later in the afternoon: “He was very happy. I can tell you he gave me a hug.”

After hearing the news,  Winston thanked his family, friends, coaches and teammates for standing by him and Meggs’ office for “reaching a decision in a conclusive manner.”

“It’s been difficult to stay silent through this process, but I never lost faith in the truth and in who I am,” Winston’s statement said.

The accuser’s family and others have accused authorities of allowing football interests to dictate the pace and depth of the investigation — Winston is a Heisman Trophy hopeful set to play for a conference championship this weekend and possibly a national championship thereafter — but Meggs brushed off the insinuation.

“We worked as fast as we could with the time constraints that we have,” he said.

While the Tallahassee Police Department’s investigation, which the accuser’s family has publicly criticized, “could have been handled better,” Meggs said, there was nothing that would necessitate an investigation of the department.

Asked specifically about the delay in collecting Winston’s DNA, Meggs called it “immaterial” because Winston’s DNA matched the DNA on the accuser’s underwear. It wasn’t a matter of whether Winston and the accuser had sex, Meggs said; it was a matter of whether it was a “forceful act.”

Another DNA sample was found on the accuser’s shorts, Meggs said, but he wouldn’t say who it belonged to.

He did, however, say the accuser “acknowledged having sex with her boyfriend, but she wouldn’t tell me who her boyfriend was.” Investigators were able to determine his identity later, he said.

The alleged victim was an FSU student, but she left school last month.


  • Brad

    I agree, cause it sounds like it would be a lifetime of cheating by him if the married.

  • http://gravatar.com/geenababe geenababe

    Well I said this case can go either way and it went the way of Jameis Winston. I do believe this woman lied because she wasn’t the only one. The thing about it is events like this hurt actual victims.

  • Anthony

    Even if the woman lied, my criticism of Winston laying with this girl stands. Even if a man cares nothing about women’s rights, it is asinine to expose oneself to the potential for life ruining trouble that Winston did over a little bit of pleasure. He showed poor judgement, immaturity, and bad character.

  • Troy

    Brian Banks

  • Anthony

    What I said about Winston is victim blaming if he is innocent, but sometimes what we call victim blaming is also common sense. Drunken hookups, especially with strangers, can go horribly wrong, if you have a future to protect, why take the risk?

More in fsu, jameis winston