Screen Shot 2015-06-12 at 5.50.50 PM

Morrissey, former frontman of the British rock group The Smiths had some choice words about President Barack Obama. In an interview with Alternative Nation, he candidly spoke about American politics and said that Obama seems white on the inside.

Oh no, he didn’t? Oh yes, he did.

Morrissey who was once critical of Hillary Clinton (who is now running for President), but said, “God Bless Barack Obama” was asked if his feelings for both politicians had changed over the years. He admitted they have changed and had this to say about Clinton:

​I criticized Hillary because she ridiculed Obama in the original election fight, and I thought that was quite low of her. I now think she is a definite for the Presidency, and really, she has no competition. When you look at other women in or around the American political circuit … Michelle Bachmann, Ann Coutler, Sarah Palin … they are all horrific spikes in the forehead, yet Hillary now seems calm and measured. But a female president won’t necessarily change anything because, as with Margaret Thatcher, if it goes wrong, the people would never again allow a woman to take the lead.

However, it seems that Morrissey’s feelings about Obama have changed drastically:

Obama has mystified me because he doesn’t appear to support black people when they need it most… Ferguson being an obvious example. If Michael Brown had instead been one of Obama’s daughters, I don’t think Obama would be insisting that the nation support the so-called security forces! How can they be called security forces if they make the people feel insecure? Obama seems to be white inside. There is an obvious racial division in America and it’s exploding and Obama doesn’t ever support the innocent black people who are murdered by white police officers who are never held accountable. You would expect him to be more understanding of what it means to be black. But so far, he hasn’t been.​ There’s no point in continually saying that we must support the police when it is obvious to the entire world that the police in America are out of control.

Did Morrissey go too far or does he have valid points?

Tags: ,
Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter
  • Jaya

    No matter what color Barack is on the inside, which is a ridiculous notion in the first place, he still married a darker black woman, shares his prominence with a darker black women and will pass on his wealth and legacy to her and their children who are unmistakably black in appearance. This is a lot more than anyone can say about the large proportion of prominent black men who share their wealth and prominence with nonblack women and pass on their wealth to them. They put the control of their legacy and their life accomplishments under the control of their nonblack wives. There is a very long list of prominent or rich black men who have done this, too many to list.

    I know there are blacks here who are chomping at the bits to accuse me of hating or having “distaste” for black men. That’s just an attempt to shield the fact that many prominent and wealthy black men channel their wealth into the hands of whites in a hurry. These are black men who everyone would say are “black on the inside.”

    • K.C.

      Preach please! Yes, to all you said.

    • Brad

      When you are right Jaya, you are right ;-)

    • TeflonD

      Another dumb commentary laced with Black male obsession and pathetic insecurity toward non Black women. What does Obama’s choice in his partner have to do with his allegiance to Black folk in any political context? I’m pretty sure that hardcore racist white slave owners procreated with “darker black women” as well, so wtf exactly is your point?

      Can you attempt to stay on topic and make a comment that actually borders on intelligence without betraying your inferiority complex with idiot ramblings?

    • Jaya

      I’m actually glad for this opening. I will ignore your inability to communicate without name calling and pejoratives because I can tell you came from a certain background.

      What this commenter has said would shut some black women up because they don’t want anyone to think they’re jealous of nonblack women’s ease in getting a black man like him. I’m not bothered by that. I would never exert any effort to get a black male like this for reasons that you’d have to see.

      So, I will break this down for any nonblack person and anyone else reading this.

      It is critically important to me as a black woman who I invest and support and whether they support me in return.

      When I was growing up, my mother belonged to a sorority and she was and still is a member of the matrons group at her church. I remember they were always involved in trying to do things to help young black MALES. So they invested hours of energy, time, their talents, and money in raising money, setting up and working in programs to help, save, and protect black MALES. Many black women across the country did and do the same thing. My mom’s group didn’t just do that for their sons or male relatives. They did it for every young black male they could drag into those programs.

      But black males like this commenter wouldn’t call THAT an “obsession with black males.” Many black males like him feel “entitled” to black women doing that for them. But black women were doing that and do that because they’re trying to preserve what’s left of the black community. They know they need viable black husbands and fathers to do that. All of those activities were an “investment” in black males.

      It’s only when black women point out how a very disproportionate number of the “most productive” black males don’t give back to black females and instead channel their resources to nonblack females that males like this commenter call “an obsession with black males.”

      When a large chunk of the most productive of those black males decide that they’re not going to give back to the women and daughters of the women who did all of that for them and will instead give the best they can produce to the women of another community, THAT results in a massive drain of resources from the black collective. Many black women need husbands at a time when 24% and rising of the more productive black men are choosing to marry and share what they produce with nonblack women.

      I’d like for a black male to answer: Why do you think so many black women rush to support, protect, defend black males? It is not because of what they have between their legs, as some of them like to grin and think. Many black women can focus above a man’s waistline.

      Black males like this commenter can call it insecurity all they want. That won’t stop me from looking at the “drain of the resources.” Those black males are funneling the return on the investment that my mom and those other black women made and make in them to a communities of women who so many of those same black males simultaneously call hostile, hateful, intolerant communities that they say are trying to destroy black people.

      People invest. They want a return on their investment.

      Or they need to stop investing in others who don’t give back. That large chunk of some of the most productive black males make a deliberate choice not to give back. The research shows that a disproportionate number of the more or most educated, most skilled, most productive black men deliberately take what they can produce and offer it to nonblack women.

      But whenever a black woman points that out, black males like this commenter call that insecurity, jealousy, or an “obsession with black males.” I sure hope a lot of other black women are reading and “processing” this. I would hope they’d stop doing anything to protect or help these ungrateful males. Some of them take what you give them and then degrade you. A growing percentage take your investment in them and channel it to nonblack women, and then say it’s their “preference.”

    • Staci Elle

      You said that.

    • John Henry

      I hear you sister! But Hey, I HAVE AN OBSESSION WITH BLACK FEMALES! AND I’M PROUD OF IT! I AM NOT ASHAMED :)

    • [email protected]

      Tell the world how you really feel Brother. Have a Great Day Brother John Henry.

    • John Henry

      You too brother Truth! Today, I’m starting out high, so that I have a long way to fall.

    • Jaya

      Lol.

    • John Henry

      LOL! Will do sister!

    • Deirdre

      @jaya
      You have stated your view perfectly and eloquently. I completely agree with your point.
      However, it was tangential to the article.
      I voted for Obama both times. And, he has been a disappointment and (if his remaining agenda passes–e.g., Amnesty for illegals) may go down in history as a disaster for the African American working class.
      So, I guess I agree both with you and the article’s author.

    • Jaya

      Yes, I focused on only a tangent of the article. To more directly address it, Obama represents many things to various people. Because of that, he hasn’t disappointed some people at all. In other cases, he hasn’t disappointed everyone to the same extent.

      African Americans are not organized enough as a body to demand accountability or anything else from any political leader. We just aren’t. Gays, Hispanics, and other groups are organized enough and will use their financial and political clout as one fist to get most of what they want. Blacks don’t do that. So it doesn’t matter to people in his position how we may think or feel; it matters to them only what we can and “will DO” to harm their political career or political party. Feeling the way that many blacks do now about him, they should have never voted to re-elect him. Blacks are too sentimental. Let’s be real. He didn’t show any signs or even hint during his first term that he was going to do anything for blacks as a separate group. Blacks just assumed he would.

    • Deirdre

      @Teflon:
      “Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”
      Jaya’s segue was pertinent and well said. Your response to her, on the other hand, was a personal attack. This says much more about you than her.

    • [email protected]

      When you’re right, you’re right. I can’t find any disagreement from your words at all.

    • Jaya

      Well, I’m right a lot of the time. lol Just because you don’t agree with me doesn’t make me wrong at all. I point out the [email protected] I see that “both” black and whites do that cause blacks great harm, whereas some here are very careful to single out only the harm that whites do.

    • [email protected]

      LOL. You have a great sense of humor. Do you. The important point is that human beings can have great discussions and still keep it moving involving life. Folks can agree to disagree in a great, progressive fashion. I don’t disagree with you on every issue. On some issues, I agree with you. On other issues, I don’t. There is nothing wrong with pointing out the wrong that people do regardless of someone’s skin color. I will also never minimize police terrorism, white racism, and any other injustice either.

    • [email protected]

      On another note, I do respect your honesty and your words certainly make me think about issues.

    • Jaya

      I respect that about you too. I noticed weeks ago that my views diverge sharply from the views of most commenters here. That has to do with the differences in our backgrounds and experiences. No more, no less. I don’t take disagreements personally. I can also name-call and use pejoratives, but I’d rather use the time and space to express my views.

    • blogdiz

      @Jaya

      Like @truthseeker you sometimes make very good points I starred Your Response upthread to @Teflon as though lengthy was excellent

      The difference with you and @truthseeker is comments like this “my views diverge sharply from the views of most commenters here. That has to do with the differences in our backgrounds and experiences”

      From what I gather this blog is not a monolith and there are varying “backgrounds and experiences ” so your message is sometimes lost because you seem to always try to condescending remind people of how special you are and and how privileged / different your back ground is whilst @truth seeker shares his knowledge in a completely different way

      I don’t want to get into a lengthy debate with you but this is something you might want to consider
      Again good response to @telflond

    • Jaya

      I appreciate your response, but there is a ‘party line’ here. Much, much cosigning. That’s all. I’ve noticed how the very few ones of us who diverge a few hairs from that party line are sometimes pounced on. I had to make a decision a few weeks ago. I either had to leave right away or stay and slug it out. I don’t mind slugging. It’s mostly a waste of energy but I decided to do it. So my reference to the probable reason for the sometimes wide divergence in views is my theory for explaining that. That’s all. I don’t understand why my saying I speak Spanish and you speak French on some topics, would be interpreted by anyone as condescending.

  • Jaya

    The main reason I don’t think any president or any prominent politician, whether white or black, who wants a political future is ever going to address police brutality in the present social climate in the U.S.. In this capitalistic country, the police protect property and they protect white people from blacks. Whites own/control almost all the property and many whites are terrified of blacks. Since I’m a black person, I think that the level of white fear of blacks is highly irrational and borders on a phobia, but most fears are irrational. Even many justice-oriented whites are afraid of blacks.

    This Morrissey guy is a Brit. I don’t think race relations in Britain are as intense as they are here.

    Whereas many blacks believe that protesting in the form of rioting will make whites listen, I think those images of the rioters cause white fear to increase. If Obama were to speak out against the police, it would cause rabid furor among many whites and nothing much would change. It would cause many Democratic party candidates to lose elections since they would become known as the anti-police party that supports “rioters.”.

    • Vintage

      But unhinged, racist whites already believe Democrats, liberals, (the new code words for nigger lovers) support anti-cop sentiment. Look at how they vilified Mayor DiBlasio simply because he noted there is bias in police activity by saying he advised his son to be extra careful with cops. One moment these neanderthals are screeching we don’t respect cops, next they are hollering because someone told their Black son to be respectful to the cops. I totally get what you are saying, but it’s frustrating because it’s like every politician is so worried about pissing off racists even if those same bigots would love nothing more than to see President Obama hanging from a tree. The fact that he still kowtows to these things, while dismissing the struggles of people who look like his wife, daughters and brother in law, makes him less of a man.

    • Jaya

      I think that both of the Obamas knew the deal. Going into this, I believe Michelle knew they were going into the big league.

      A short term solution might be for blacks to rally for predominantly black areas to be policed by mainly “screened” black policemen, but there would need to be a civilian arm heavily involved in non-police work, helping out. These black cops would need to be screened because many black cops also don’t feel emotionally close to blacks.

      I’ve read where black scholars and pundits on this topic have suggested there be a black political party that could swing elections in tight races. That would give blacks real power. This is an old idea, but to my knowledge, blacks have never seriously worked towards it.

    • [email protected]

      I remembered when those reactionaries slandered DeBlasio for just telling his son to be careful. Also, Patrick Lynch slandered DeBlasio as having blood on his hands as well.

    • vintage3000

      That ‘blood on his hands’ comment was unbelievable. They know darn good and well how much racial bias is in the NYPD. Lynch and his minions even tried to say Eric Garner died from a heart attack because of his weight. Even though the entire world, including the man’s family, has seen that video. The length these demons will go to is unreal. And the awful irony is that i believe much of this evil was unleashed BECAUSE President Obama was elected.

    • [email protected]

      Yes, these extremists have demonic hatred. What Lynch did bordered on mutiny with his overtly disrespectful comments. Some in the NYPD are known for racism. Even the Knapp Commission of the 1970’s documented the corruption and racial bias found in the NYPD. Even the President has suffered slander. I don’t agree with President Obama on some issues, but I will never call him out of his name. Many Tea Party extremists have disrespected him, his wife, his children, and his other relatives. Eric Garner was a Brother who was choked to death by a murdering cop. These racists have no shame and their agenda is totally anti-human.

      RIP Eric Garner.

    • Jaya

      I don’t think what they do has much at all to do with hatred. Maybe the most bigoted ones, the nobodies, the ones with the tiniest brains “hate,” but the ones who make their system work are not guided by “feelings.” Instead, they have a “goal” and it’s to stay on top or be the ones who control the rest and have control of the resources, no matter what they have to do. So the most effective way to do that is to control ideas and images, to make the populace think they don’t see and hear what they actually do see and hear. Controlling and manipulating ideas and images are much easier and cheaper to do than controlling people. This is gaslighting 101 and it always works UNLESS people know or believe they’re being gaslighted and reject it.

      Many people don’t care if they’re being gaslighted especially when it gives them lots of privileges.

      For those folks, being the top dogs and remaining at the top for them and their families and staying there for the generations of people like them is like their north star. They created a whole ideology to make that possible. Their entire world or existence is built around that core goal.

    • [email protected]

      Enjoy your Day Sister vintage3000.

    • vintage3000

      Thank you, you too truthseeker2436577!

  • K.C.

    White men are so darn lucky. You gotta give it to them. They can bamboozle any black person for their support if you know how to conquer and divide black people. If you come on this blog on any given day, black people are bashing gay people. The minute you have a GAY WHITE MAN (as is Morrissey) able to bash the 1st non white president of the United States, black people will side with him because again, divide and conquer. Nevermind, Morrissey’s record is highly questionable. Gee, is this the same Morrissey who performed for a neo-Nazi, skinhead group a few years back in England to the point that advertisers pulled out of his concert? Is this the same anti-immigration in England, anti-other Morrissey? Yes, why it is him. See, I gotta give it to white men, they know how to get us. He knows if he makes black people feel that Barack Obama is against them, he can get them on his side. He then, in the end, can win. Just one question for Morrissey: if Barack is anti-black and “white on the inside” does Morrissey’s enlightened white male privilege revelation/declaration make him “black on the inside”? See white men believe that not only do they know us by judging us on our outside, they also believe they have the power to know what we are on the “inside”. Furthermore, they believe our blackness is so weak, that THEY can be more “black on the inside” than us. I mean surely, if Barack is white on the inside and Morrissey is savvy enough to figure this out then surely Morrissey is by conclusion “more black on the inside” than Barack. THAT my friends is another edition of “WHITE MALE PRIVILEGE” coming to a self-hating black debate near you!

    • Vintage

      Meanwhile, you are still unable to refute the actual points Morrissey made regarding Obama’s dismissal of police brutality against Black people. What does it look up there, so far up Obama’s rear end? Do you see a light at the end of the tunnel?-lol

    • K.C.

      Oh there you are again. I am not surprised. Every single Obama post, you seem to troll me in order to get me to engage you. My dear, you should be satisfied enough by your own convictions without needing to drag me into bed with you on them, no? If secure enough of your point of view, stay in your lane and do you. Why are you still trying to get me to side with you? I don’t and I won’t. Nothing changed from the last time you insulted and tried to demean me on an Obama post for having…wait for it…gosh just imagine…having MY OWN POINT OF VIEW. So Boo, I can’t give you what you need: attention. I am certain you have enough people in your life, on blogs or anywhere you need to validate your point of view. I am not your mother, I am not nursing you on this one so get off my T***t. I am very comfortable with my point of view. Be comfortable in yours and stop nagging for support. Bye and smooches! Kisses!

    • vintage3000

      Question: What’s it like living so far up Obama’s butt, do you see a light at the end of the tunnel there?

    • K.C.

      vintage3000: You see that is exactly the point I made above – you are (I assume a grown black woman or maybe a grown black man), I am a grown black woman. A pretty smart one too. It is inconceivable for you to go against Obama, make your points without attacking me personally and suggesting I am “up his butt”. It is really inconceivable for you to do otherwise huh? Am I not entitled to my opinion as you are to yours? Do you actually believe every single person should and will agree with you on your (seemingly quite personal) attack on Barack Obama and his supporters? Like I said to you and to the other vintage name you use: I fundamentally disagree and categorically disagree with you on this issue. That is my right. It is unfortunate that it doesn’t occur to you that this is a free country and others have the right to have their own point of view without you suggesting that they are “up the President’s butt”. How juvenile of a statement. It is bizarre and immature behavior that I don’t expect from grown black people on a blog that I for the most part consider pretty classy. You’ve done it before too. Repeatedly. On every Obama post, you open up your attack and have tried to put me down before for not agreeing with you. Sis, if that makes you feel good and makes you more at peace with your own convictions – so, be it. You don’t know me and I don’t know you. Go ahead and continue to attack me personally because I don’t cosign your ideas. No sweat here. I support Obama and I am very comfortable in my support. For some reason, that boils your blood. It’s all good. I just wish we could have a mature and adult debate without the personal attacks. Once you go there, I have nothing to say to you. I don’t tolerate personal attacks from anyone. Like I said before, at 15 I allowed people to put me down like that. As an adult black woman now, I do not allow it in any shape or form. Once a person goes there, I know the conversation is over. I would never give you the benefit of debating the issue with you. Your goal is not to debate, it is to shame and put down people who think differently than you. I think you may need to look into why that is your tactic. You take care.

    • vintage3000

      Meanwhile you can call Black people who don’t genuflect to Obama as “self hating”, brainwashed, etc. Your goal isn’t to debate either, because you lack the intellectual curiosity to address the salient political points brought up in Morrissey’s comments and this thread. All Black Americans are not in the Obama fan club, and it’s not even about that far as I am concerned.

      WE as a people need to be more discerning when we elect politicians and choose our leaders. That is the main thing I have learned from the Obama administration, and I scoped him out in the first term when he started throwing Black people in his administration under the bus: Desiree Washington, Van Jones, AG Holder. He is a prime example of a Democrat who took advantage of Black voters, and he is showing us his ass on his way out.

    • K.C.

      I didn’t hit reply and personally attack you. You, on the other hand, repeatedly reply to personally attack me. Bizarre as we don’t know each other. Like I said, when I was fifteen I allowed people to talk to me however they wished. As a grown, adult black woman, I don’t allow it anymore. I will not debate the issue with you when you make personal attacks. I don’t agree with you on the issue. Somehow, you just can’t accept that. I can’t help you with that. Free country, you are entitled to your opinion and I am to mine. I ask that you refrain from personally attacking me. That’s all. Move on, I support the President. You don’t. Go figure, someone disagrees with you. What a tragedy.

    • vintage3000

      “I ask that you refrain from personally attacking me.”

      LOL-telling the truth on your hero is “attacking” you and making you cry. Sounds like you have a mental issue.

    • K.C.

      Nope. Attacking someone personally for having a differing point of you and suggesting they are “far up the president’s ass” is a personal attack. That said, if you need to attack me because it makes you feel better, then continue to do it. Now that I think of it, I can’t deprive you of that. It is unfortunate on your part but so be it sis. Continue. Take care.

    • blogdiz

      I can assure you that if anything were to happen to this GAY White Man as you put it Obama would be quicker to come to his defense than if you a black person was unjustifiably abused / killed by cops

      Sometimes I just cant with the extreme thinking on these sites its either all or nothing ,you do realize that one can respect that fact that Obama is the President , admire some of his qualities, even defend him & First Family from racist attacks and still call him out on failed aspects of his Presidency and yes, his whole tone and approach to the escalating police brutality against black people will go down in History as his abject failure similar to Bush and Katrina and the Iraq wars

      This blind worship and belief by many black people that Obama is beyond reproach becuz hes the first black President just enables much of his tomfoolery

    • K.C.

      Blogdiz: I will give you one thing, your point on the extreme thinking on these blogs is indeed unfortunate. I agree with you on that. I come to this site because it is certainly much more mature than the people on Bossip etc. However I am fascinated that people can’t make their point of view without this deep need to convince others to think the way they do. I am fascinated that these posts because this bizarre aggression into putting people down for having their own point of view. Do you really actually believe that every single black person agrees with your point of view on this and every issue? Do you really actually believe that you are categorically right and everyone is categorically wrong who disagrees with you? I am entitled to my opinion. I consider myself a pretty smart woman who weighs and balances all things before coming to my own conclusions. I was not always that way at 15 but now as an adult, I am pretty secure that once I open my mouth, I trust that what I say is based on balanced logic. I do not ask others to agree with me. Why would I? Your post is typical of people who disagree with President. It is not enough for them to feel that way, they need a posse to fall in line with them on it. I am not that person. I disagree with you fundamentally and that’s it. Yes, that’s it. I am sure you have plenty of people you can seduce into agreeing with you. I am not that person. Never worked for me and won’t here. Sorry.

    • blogdiz

      I Never asked you to agree with me , In fact if you look at your posts on this topic YOU are doing the exact same things that you are accusing others of

      According to you “My post is typical of people who disagree with President” therein lies my my point I do not disagree with the President , I admire his handling of some things but do not approve of his approach towards police brutality a major issue which incidentally IS the topic of THIS thread

      You have unnecessarily brought up Mr Morrison Gayness , white privilege and pretty much alluded that any one who disagrees with you is a hater/self hating black
      Yet you have been unable to logically refute any of Mr Morrison’s points which is the hallmark of “mature debate Not ad hominemn red herring and straw man fallacies

    • K.C.

      If that is how you see it then so be it. I stand by my comments, you stand by yours. I stand by my support of the President and you stand by your retraction from him. If you care to see the nuance in my post, I was suggesting that a while man can tell black people the degree to which another black person is “black on the inside” and those black people (in my opinion) would be self-haters for allowing someone outside of their race to determine the degrees of blackness. You then referred to my support of a politician I CHOOSE to support as blind worship. It did not occur to you that given how I see things, research I have done, facts I have considered and ultimately who I am leads me to support who I choose to support. Why is it so important for you to get me on your side? I stand by what I said about Morrissey and any white person who prescribes to that ridiculous notion that our “inside blackness” can be defined, limited and ultimately taken away from us based on the choices we make in life. I can tell you now, there is nothing that I could do from birth to the day I die that can lessen my “inside blackness”. I was born black and I will always be black. I will never allow anyone (white or black for that matter) to ridiculously tell me otherwise. Like I said, I love great debates but what I will not engage in is debate with anyone who tries to put down my person. I did it at 15 quite often but as a grown black woman, I don’t do it now. You personally attack me and the conversation is over. Period.

    • blogdiz

      So Having a different opinion = personal attacks ?? LOL Really
      You keep bringing up the age 15 a lot and now I See for good reason

    • K.C.

      No, having a differing opinion does not equal personal attack. However, referring to someone who has a differing opinion as someone exercising “blind worship” and having a warped mental state is a personal attack. Yes, I do bring up the age 15 point because attacking someone for having a differing opinion and being mad that they don’t see things your way is a 15-year-old’s game. As mentioned repeatedly, at 15 I allowed that behavior to enter my space because I was young. I am now an adult black woman who has traveled the world, obtained a great amount of education and has had enough complex life experiences to be able to weigh things and ultimately come to the conclusion that I CHOOSE to come to. This journey does not allow for random people to come in and decide they will put me down for the way I think. Be secure in your point of view and stick to it. Don’t expect that everyone has to agree with you. Also, don’t automatically assume you are right. Just stick to your convictions, be proud of your ability to support ideas and people that serve you and keep it moving. Don’t also decide that you need others to be on the same page as you. The world simply does not work that way. I am happy it doesn’t work that way. How boring it would be otherwise. Take care.

    • blogdiz

      Yawn

    • K.C.

      As I thought. Stay in the light. You take care.

    • grendo

      what does yawn mean?

    • vintage3000

      ” just enables much of his tomfoolery”

      Yes it does. During the last presidential campaign, the ONLY Black venue Obama visited was the Apollo in Harlem. For a fundraiser. And he sang an Al Green song, and of course the Black people in the audience went wild laughing, applauding, etc. Which would have been fine if there was a serious discussion afterwards about issues relevant to our communities. There wasn’t. He saved that for when he visited several Hispanic media outlets. We are the most adaptable, flexible people on the planet (regardless of nationality). But sometimes we are also some of the most simple minded, because we are glad when someone gives us a few minutes of attention.

    • K.C.

      You may consider learning how to debate politics (always a tough subject to tackle) without putting people down for having a differing opinion than you. It may not occur to you but once you do that, people feel you are more interested in being combative than having an intelligent debate. Also, not everyone agrees with you. Not everyone who disagrees with you is wrong. You are no more an authority as I am an authority. You don’t have to admit it here to me but when you sign off here, really do look at your tone and tactic for handling people who think differently with you. That kind of attack can easily finds its way in the many ways we communicate with people in our personal lives. Seriously, look at it. There is no need for the level of mean in your posts. At 15, we do that but not as adults. I say that to you with much sincerity.

    • vintage3000

      I thought you were igging me, chick. Now go back to crying in your beer because we are not all holding pom poms for Obama.

      You already stated you are not here to debate politics and that is the only truthful thing you’ve said. You are here to carry Obama water, now go back to it.

    • K.C.

      vintage3000: your immature personal attacks are sad. Truly I mean that. Did not expect that from a blog targeted at adult black women. Your tone is mean but that just means that is how you get things I imagine: by bullying people into agreeing with you. I am guessing here because again I don’t know who you are and you don’t know who I am. I support Barack Obama and you don’t. I know this is traumatic for you apparently as you seem to think the world works differently and everyone should agree with you. I can’t help you with that. I really can’t so good luck! Happy Monday!

    • elle D.

      You said that—>thank you!!!

  • Staci Elle

    Well damn… I like President Obama ( and his adorable family) but he did have some good points. If I was in his position I would be far more hands on with the murders of all of these black men women and children.

    • blogdiz

      Exactly! but some here feel like those two positions cannot co -exist
      No objectivity whatsoever

  • grendo

    Does anyone here even know who Morrissey is?